Venture Intentions Page
The production ledger of a venture. It shows what is built, what is in motion, and what is still blank — so a collaborator (or the founder using the page as self-coach) can pick the next concrete dot and ship it. The page exists to cause work, not to report on it.
Primary audience: Collaborator considering helping, or the founder using the page as a weekly scoreboard. Decision-makers and outside readers route to the one-page plan or the pitch page, not here.
Job
The intentions page causes a collaborator or the founder-as-self-coach to claim the next dot at status blank or started, name the concrete next move, and ship it within a named window.
Reader Profile
Role. A collaborator (potential builder, mentor, partner) deciding whether to contribute; or the founder reviewing the production line for the week.
Moment. Has read enough to know the venture is real and wants to know whether there is a place to contribute that matches their capacity. Or it is the start of a work cycle and the founder is choosing where to spend the next unit of attention.
Tension. Wants to contribute meaningfully and to ship something visible; fears claiming the wrong thing or stepping into work that does not actually need them.
Direct Action Contract
The page must answer each of the seven on-surface in two sentences or fewer.
- What problem matters now? — Named at the top: which gap is the production line trying to close this cycle.
- What happens if nothing changes? — Named per dot at status
started— what stalls if this dot stays atstarted. - What better future is available? — The "built" state of each dot, written as the changed state, not as a checklist item.
- Why trust this route? — The status legend itself: filled is shipped, outline is started, blank is the next move. The shape proves the route.
- What is the first action? — Each blank or started dot carries one named next-move with a verb, an owner, and a window.
- What outcome makes the journey worth joining? — A built dot transitions another dot from blank to started, which the page makes visible by sequencing the dots.
- What kill signal keeps the bet honest? — A named threshold for production-line stall (e.g. no dot-status transition for a window). If breached, the page is rebuilt or the venture takes the signal and stops.
Output — the artifact shape
| Slot | Section | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eyebrow + venture name | Identity |
| 2 | Hero with status counts | At-a-glance state of the production line |
| 3 | One-sentence summary of this cycle's focus | Frame for which dots matter most |
| 4 | The dot ledger (sequenced) | The production line itself |
| 5 | Per-dot card: name, group, status, useful-for, current note, next-move CTA | The unit of work |
| 6 | Methodology footer with cross-links | Where the dots come from |
| 7 | Close — copyable prompt for the founder reviewing the page | Self-coach affordance |
The dot ledger is sequenced top to bottom in build order, not grouped by status. Sequence beats clustering: a reader follows the line, not a category.
Action
Primary action. Pick one dot at status blank or started, name the concrete next move, and ship it. For the founder: claim the next dot for this cycle. For the collaborator: send a one-line message saying "I can take dot N for window W."
Wrong action. Read the page, nod, take no action. The page becomes a status report; the dots stay at started forever; the founder confuses motion-described with motion-happening.
Source affordance. Each dot card carries a one-line current-state note and a next-move CTA. The next-move is the affordance — it names the verb, the owner, and the window. Without all three, the affordance fails and the dot stays at started.
Outcome Cascade
Right action (the bet pays out)
| Order | Effect |
|---|---|
| 1° Direct | A dot transitions from blank to started, or from started to built, within the named window |
| 2° Downstream | A receipt of the transition lands in the venture's evidence trail; the next dependent dot becomes ship-able |
| 3° System | The production line compounds; pass-conditions are captured in artifacts that the next cycle inherits |
| 4° Cultural | The team learns that the page is a work surface, not a scoreboard; claiming a dot is normal, not heroic |
| 5° Structural | The venture's iteration cadence becomes predictable; the next-blueprint forecast can name effort, token cost, and time-to-ship with low variance |
Wrong action (the page fails its job)
| Order | Effect |
|---|---|
| 1° Direct | The reader leaves having claimed nothing; the page registers no transition |
| 2° Downstream | The dot status drift continues; started accumulates because nothing forces a transition |
| 3° System | Founder credibility decays — the page reports motion that did not happen, and the reader notices |
| 4° Cultural | Collaborators learn that the page is decorative; the next collaborator does not even read it |
| 5° Structural | The production line invisibly stalls; the venture's failure mode becomes "looks busy, ships nothing" |
Kill Signal
zero dot-status transitions for 90 days → page is decoration; rebuild or delete heuristic
Owner: the venture lead. Measurement: weekly diff of dot statuses. Consequence when the signal fires: rewrite the dots to match what is actually being worked, or delete the page and admit the production line is dormant.
Instrument Flow
Upstream
These instruments feed the intentions page.
Adjacent
These instruments strengthen or qualify the page.
Downstream
These artifacts consume the intentions page output.
Source Map
| Intentions section | Primary source instrument | Supporting instrument | Downstream consumer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cycle focus line | This cycle's plan | Idea Capture | All other pages |
| Dot definitions | Business Idea Checklist | Idea Capture | Proof page, One-Page Plan |
| Dot statuses | Operations Scorecard | Receipts trail | One-Page Plan §9 |
| Next-move CTAs | This cycle's plan | Constraint Map | Operations Scorecard |
| Kill signal | Operations Scorecard | One-Page Plan §14 | Proof page |
Procedure
- Start from a fixed list of dots. The list is the venture's production checklist — not invented per cycle. Reuse a published checklist (the Business Idea Checklist, the Minimum Venture Package, or the venture's own published version).
- For each dot, write a one-sentence "useful-for" — the function the dot serves when shipped. This is what survives if the dot's contents change.
- For each dot, set status:
built,started, orblank. The legend is binary at the edges;startedmeans at least one artifact exists but the pass-condition has not been met. - For each
startedorblankdot, write the next-move with a verb, an owner, and a window. Three fields. If you cannot name all three, the dot is not actionable and the page is lying. - Sequence the dots in build order. Earlier dots feed later dots. The reader follows the line, not a category.
- Add a one-line summary at the top: this cycle's focus. The cycle focus is the lens through which a collaborator chooses where to help.
- Test the page weekly: how many dots have transitioned status this week? If zero for two weeks, run the kill signal.
Do Not Include
- Dots without owners. An unowned dot is decorative; it never transitions because no one is accountable.
- Dots without a verb in the next-move. "More research" is not a next-move; "Interview three customers by Friday" is.
- Status without a transition history. If
builtnever has a date, the page cannot prove the production line moves. - Aspirational dots from outside the production checklist. Aspirations belong on the pitch page; the intentions page is the work surface for the dots that already exist.
- Dot-completion celebration above the fold. The page rewards the next move, not the last one.
- Numeric scores per dot. Scoring belongs on the one-page plan; the intentions page is a work surface, not a measurement surface.
Scoring Rubric
Score each dimension from 1 to 5.
| Dimension | 1 | 3 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Action affordance | No next-moves named | Next-moves named but missing owner or window | Every started/blank dot has verb + owner + window |
| Sequence clarity | Dots grouped by status | Dots loosely ordered | Dots strictly sequenced in build order |
| Status honesty | All dots claim started | Some built are unverified | Every built carries a date and a linked artifact |
| Cycle focus | No frame | Frame named generically | One-sentence frame names the dot the cycle most needs to advance |
| Transition cadence | No history | Some dots transitioned last quarter | Multiple dots transitioned in the last 30 days |
| Honesty | No kill signal | Kill signal stated but not measured | Kill signal stated, measured weekly, and the page proves it has not fired |
Investor or board standard: no dimension below 4.
CopyablePrompt
For the page builder or the founder reviewing the page:
I am reviewing the intentions page for a venture. Before I claim or assign the
next dot, I want to confirm the page is doing its job — causing the next
concrete move, not reporting on the last one.
For each dot at status started or blank, answer:
- What is the next move? Name the verb.
- Who owns the next move? Name the person or team.
- When is the window? Name the date.
If any of the three is blank, the dot is decorative — either fix it or set the
dot to blank and stop pretending it is in motion.
For each dot at status built, answer:
- What is the linked artifact? Name the URL or file path.
- When did this dot transition? Name the date.
If either is blank, the dot is not actually built; demote it to started.
Finally, the cycle focus question: of all started/blank dots, which one most
needs to advance this cycle? Why this one and not the others? If you cannot
answer, the page has no cycle focus and is a status report; rewrite the focus
line before the next review.
Questions
- Which dot has stayed at
startedlongest — and what is the unstated reason it has not advanced? - If the kill signal fired tomorrow, which dots are you ready to admit were never going to move?
- Of the
builtdots, how many have a linked artifact that another person could re-run from scratch? - If a collaborator opened the page right now, which dot would they pick — and is that the dot the founder most needs picked?