Studios and Games
📄️ Space Nation
Analysis | Website | YouTube
📄️ Star Atlas
Analysis | Website
📄️ Wilder World
Analysis | Website | YouTube
📄️ AI Arena
Analysis | Website
📄️ Axie Infinity
Analysis
📄️ Horizon
Analysis
📄️ Illuvium
Analysis
📄️ Loot Project
Analysis
📄️ Pirate Nation
Analysis | Website
📄️ Shrapnel
Analysis | SHRAP | Website
📄️ Altered State Machine
Analysis | Website
📄️ Honeyland
Analysis
Analysis
Western audiences look for games where fulfilling gameplay provides primary incentive to spend time in the game. DON'T invest money/time in games that:
- implement earning mechanisms from day one targeting investors looking for RoI.
- allow guilds built on yield to constitute the majority of the starting player base.
- require new players buying new NFTs to bring capital/liquidity into the game.
- unclear burn strategy. Inflation will get out of control.
Create a standard checklist for reviewing web3 games.
Studios
| Name | Notes |
|---|---|
| Animoca Brands | |
| Neo Tokyo | |
| Playa3ull Games | |
| Superverse | |
| Nike |
Games
- boredbox.io
- Bloktopia
- BollyHeroes
- Decentraland
- Lukso
- Pills.game
- Roblox
- Space Somnium
- ushockgaming
- Zepeto
Recent News
Context
Questions
What makes the difference between a web3 game that builds a genuine player community and one that collapses when yield-focused guilds exit?
- The checklist flags games that implement earning mechanisms from day one targeting investors — how does Animoca Brands' portfolio strategy navigate this tension across its many studio investments?
- Western audiences are described as prioritizing fulfilling gameplay over return-on-investment — does this mean Asian markets present a more viable launch path for economically-driven web3 game mechanics?
- An unclear burn strategy is listed as a critical failure signal — what burn mechanisms have proven most effective at controlling token inflation without destroying player incentives?