Skip to main content

First Principles

How do you cut through bullshit to validate the truth, and apply force where it creates the greatest step improvement?

The Laws of Physics are the ultimate constraint, everything else is a recommendation. First-principles reasoning means stripping back to what the laws of physics actually permit, then asking why you're not doing that. Everything between current reality and physical limits is explainable by institutional habit, misaligned incentives, or unquestioned assumption.

Strip away received wisdom and reason from what you can

validate consistently

to be true.

The Tight Five​

Question Effectively, Remove Regularly, Optimize Effectiveness, Accelerate Cycles, Automate Flow.

01

Question every requirement

Every requirement should come with a name attached — not a department, a person. Requirements from smart people are the most dangerous because they're harder to question. Ask: what would break if we removed this? If the answer is "nothing certain," remove it.

02

Delete the part or process

Your target is to delete 10% more than feels comfortable. If you're not adding things back, you deleted too little. The asymmetry matters: adding back a wrongly deleted part costs one sprint; carrying a wrongly kept part costs forever.

03

Simplify or optimise

Only after deletion. Optimising something that shouldn't exist is the most common and most expensive engineering mistake. Simplification that happens before deletion just makes the wrong thing faster.

04

Accelerate cycle time

Once the system is stripped and simplified, find every bottleneck and compress it. If you're not occasionally embarrassed by how fast you moved, you're moving too slow. Speed reveals the next constraint.

05

Automate flow

Last, never first. Automation of a flawed process locks in the flaw at scale. Every step above must precede this one.

Context Management​

Needless context switching/overload is the enemy of effective thinking. To be maximally effective, plan ahead to match the task with mindset based on the context of complexity, environment and available compute power vs systemized know-how.

Reasoning by Analogy

  • — "This is how it's done"
  • — Incremental improvement
  • — Constrained by precedent
  • — Fast but local

Reasoning by First Principles

  • — "What's actually required?"
  • — Step-change innovation
  • — Constrained only by physics
  • — Slow but global

Operational Memory: Most thinking is analogy — copying what others did. First principles creates what didn't exist. Lazy, tired, stressed, and over-loaded minds take route 1.

Applications​

Process Improvement: How to use first principles to prevent lazy thinking and dogma to re-examine fulfillment of potential.

Systems Thinking

Rules of Thumb

Solutions Are Temporary​

Solutions are temporary, questions are timeless.

SpaceX · Musk's question

"What are rockets made of?"

Answer

Aluminum, titanium, copper, carbon fiber.

Insight

Raw materials = 2% of price. Built in-house.

Improvement

Cut costs 90%.

Fall Into The-Gap​

In the Tight Five, Principles is the Filter — the invisible binding that makes four cells into one coherent loop. It is not a single concept but three nested layers:

Layer 1 — Method

First Principles

Question

What is actually true? (this page)

What it grounds

The reasoning method — strip assumptions, decompose to fundamentals, rebuild.

Layer 2 — Compass

Values

Question

What matters and why?

What it grounds

Utility → Desire → Belief — how value transforms and distributes.

Layer 3 — Proof

Virtues

Question

How do you show up?

What it grounds

Character under pressure — embodiment, not just knowledge.

First Principles is the entry point because you cannot know what to value without first knowing what is true. Values are the compass. Virtues are the proof that the compass is real — not just stated. The Filter is invisible in the logo (white space) for the same reason character is invisible until tested.

The three layers apply at every scale. A business's Principles cell = the core logic that transforms input to output, the values that govern trade-offs, the culture that embodies both. A country's Principles cell = the truths that bind citizens, the legal system that encodes values, the norms that hold when rules can't.

Seek The Truth​

If a life is eighteen holes on the archipelago, each hole, played honestly, deposits a truth. The principle is the stamp on the scorecard. The harvest pattern is the reason the round was worth playing.

Self
The body is the first instrument — break it and every other reading is corrupted.
Resources
Time you cannot recover. Money you can. Confusing the two is the most expensive trade most people ever make.
Bonds
You become the average of the foursome you walk with. Choose the foursome before you choose the round.
Truth
The cost of integrity is paid in the moment. The return is paid for the rest of the round.
Power
Leadership is the rare swing that makes the rest of the foursome better — without making them dependent.
Legacy
The exit is the one swing you take only once. The preparation is the swing — the moment itself is the follow-through.

The principles ledger is not a library you fill once. It is a living book, refined hole by hole, edited by the rounds that broke you and the ones that compounded. The first-principles method strips assumptions; the round deposits the truth that survived the strip. The two practices are the same loop running on different timescales.

Context​

Questions​

The open loop

What received wisdom are you treating as first principles without having decomposed it?

  • — Which domain's first principles do you know intellectually but fail to apply under pressure?
  • — Where would stripping to fundamentals reveal that the problem you're solving shouldn't exist?
  • — What assumption would invalidate everything you've built if it turned out to be wrong?