Baseline
Unknown. Read the sample.
Guiding instrument
Sequence the first transformation move behind proof.
The roadmap starts with a bounded diagnostic, not a software module. Mike chooses one constraint, narrows the evidence gap, or stops the thesis before planning later investment.
Proof sequence
Five moves. One decision.
- WindowDays 1–3MoveFrameOutputSelect 15 opportunities and confirm privacy boundariesOwnerMikeGateSample accepted
- WindowDays 4–10MoveCodeOutputRecord source, decisions, delays, outcomes, and unknownsOwnerMike + teamGate15 comparable rows
- WindowDays 11–20MoveListenOutputHold five ecosystem conversations against the relationship mapOwnerMikeGateContribution evidence
- WindowDays 21–25MoveDiagnoseOutputCompare demand, bidding, delivery, and visibilityOwnerMikeGateOne candidate constraint
- WindowDays 26–30MoveDecideOutputChoose, narrow, or stop the next interventionOwnerMikeGateSigned decision rule
| Window | Move | Output | Owner | Gate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days 1–3 | Frame | Select 15 opportunities and confirm privacy boundaries | Mike | Sample accepted |
| Days 4–10 | Code | Record source, decisions, delays, outcomes, and unknowns | Mike + team | 15 comparable rows |
| Days 11–20 | Listen | Hold five ecosystem conversations against the relationship map | Mike | Contribution evidence |
| Days 21–25 | Diagnose | Compare demand, bidding, delivery, and visibility | Mike | One candidate constraint |
| Days 26–30 | Decide | Choose, narrow, or stop the next intervention | Mike | Signed decision rule |
Setpoint
One constraint chosen with evidence by 14 August 2026.
Cap
20 team hours. No new software.
Decision gates
Continue, narrow, stop, or reset.
- DecisionContinueEvidence15 rows expose a repeated constraintResponseFund the smallest intervention against its gauge
- DecisionNarrowEvidenceA constraint appears but the sample is weakResponseCollect the cheapest missing fact only
- DecisionStopEvidenceRelationships show no material decision effectResponseDrop the relationship thesis and follow the measured constraint
- DecisionResetEvidenceNo stage can be read reliablyResponseObserve the workflow before changing tools or outreach
| Decision | Evidence | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Continue | 15 rows expose a repeated constraint | Fund the smallest intervention against its gauge |
| Narrow | A constraint appears but the sample is weak | Collect the cheapest missing fact only |
| Stop | Relationships show no material decision effect | Drop the relationship thesis and follow the measured constraint |
| Reset | No stage can be read reliably | Observe the workflow before changing tools or outreach |
Installed-base hypotheses
Test referral, service, monitoring, maintenance, or repeat work with existing customers only as hypotheses. Continue one only when consented conversations and opportunity outcomes show a repeated need; do not present it as promised revenue.
Method: sequence an AI transformation behind its binding constraint. Put this to work Copy this prompt. Paste into Claude, ChatGPT, or any AI assistant. The page context is already loaded — send it and get analysis tailored to your role.Make the stop-or-continue decision
You are an independent proof reviewer.
Review Solar365's 30-day diagnostic and return exactly one decision: CONTINUE, NARROW, STOP, or RESET.
Ask one question at a time until the evidence for 15 varied opportunities, five ecosystem conversations, the 20-hour cap, and the named constraint can be checked. Label every answer FACT, REPORTED, INFERRED, ESTIMATE, ASSUMPTION, or UNKNOWN. Do not fill missing values or calculate unsupported ROI.
Name the owner, source, baseline, setpoint, review date, and kill signal. Return exactly one of the four decisions with its evidence boundary and no blended recommendation. End with the smallest action that enacts that decision.
Verdict
CONDITIONAL GO
Proceed when Mike accepts the 20-hour cap, privacy boundary, review date, and stop conditions.