Analyse Supplied Evidence
See the signal in supplied evidence without inventing the rest. A finding is output. The decision remains human.
Use when. Evidence is supplied and a question is named, but the finding is not.
Do not use when. Sources are missing, or you want the model to act on the finding.
Your input. Question; supplied sources; what must not be assumed; named owner.
Your quality check. Every claim traces to a supplied source. Contradictions stay visible. Action stays blank.
Put this to work
Prepare one evidence finding
For the named decision ownerCopy this prompt. Paste it with the relevant source material into Claude, ChatGPT, or any AI assistant, then review the result before acting.
Human decision — cannot be delegated. Act, hold, or stop. AI may analyse only. No clinic CTA.
Outcome
A finding that separates supplied evidence, contradictions, and unknowns.
Use When
Use when evidence is supplied and a question is named, but the finding is not.
Inputs
Question; supplied sources; what must not be assumed; named owner.
Recipe
Copy the prompt. Paste only supplied material. Leave the human decision blank.
Human and AI Control
An assistant may draft and report. Named owner decides what the finding means and whether to act. The tool is a player, not the job.
Output and Handoff
Return the Evidence finding and the blank human decision.
Evidence and Stop
Demand is hypothesized and the outcome is untested. Stop when the owner, the job boundary, or a required input is missing.
Reliability
Skill and tool: evidence analysis using a private reasoning assistant limited to supplied sources. The Evidence finding is the pattern; source binding and a blank human decision is the protocol. Retain the returned brief as evidence. Accept only a result the named human can verify against the supplied inputs.
Next
Return the result to the named owner. Do not register autonomous execution until a completed prompt trial and an accepted execution contract exist.