Thought To Thing
How does a raw thought become a real thing?
Use flow-thought-to-thing when one idea needs to leave the hopper. The job is not to keep more notes. The job is to decide the next durable home.
Standard
- Capture the raw thought without polishing it.
- Route it with
flow-route. - Refine only enough to choose the exit.
- Exit to one of the durable homes:
/playbook,/beliefs,src/pages/agents, Stackmates demand,drmgstate,.WIK, receipt, or deletion. - Record the decision when it changes FLOW, playbook, language, or routing truth.
.FLOW is transient. It is a factory, not storage.
Action
Use this page when one thought is stuck between note, demand, article, page, and deletion. The operator should leave with exactly one next durable artifact.
Exit choices:
/playbookwhen the thought is reusable know-how./beliefsorsrc/pages/beliefswhen it is a public argument.src/pages/agentswhen it changes shared agent language.- Stackmates demand when it needs Engineering.
.WIKwhen it is private context.- A receipt when the decision itself is the durable proof.
- Deletion when the thought has no current value.
Checks
- One thought enters.
- One next durable thing exits.
- No public link points at
.FLOW. - The exit has a proof or review trigger.
Failure Modes
- Hopper hoarding: the thought stays in
.FLOWbecause no exit is chosen. - Overwriting the raw signal: polishing starts before the route is known.
- Public leak: private
.WIKor.FLOWcontext becomes public content. - False durability: a note is kept because it exists, not because it earned a home.
Context
- Triad System — sort raw signal into Reality, Dream, or Bridge.
- Principles — decide by governing rule, not by note volume.
- Page Types — choose the destination by job.
- Demand Handover — send build needs to Stackmates instead of building here.
Questions
What is the smallest durable thing this thought deserves?
- Does this belong in public know-how, public argument, private memory, Engineering, or deletion?
- What proof would show the route was correct?
- What would make this thought worth revisiting later?