Skip to main content

Continuous Improvement

What is still unclear or failing in the work you want to improve?

Standards supplies the measurable setpoint. Performance compares observed output and outcomes with it. Continuous Improvement selects the correction method. Evolution decides what accepted evidence changes, confirms the authority, and retains the correction for the next run.

Variance can only be located in work that has been named. When the jobs a function must manage were never listed, start with Process Inventory; the rest of this hub corrects work you can already point at.

Standard → execution → Performance variance → Improvement method
    ↑                                              ↓
    └──── Evolution retains authorized correction ┘

One failed run does not prove the standard is wrong. Correct execution or the producing process first when that is where the evidence points. Revise or retire a standard only with named evidence, authority, and a falsifiable next-run assertion.

The Spine​

  1. Process Inventory — list the total set of jobs and tasks the function must manage when it is unclear what work exists at all.
  2. Process Mapping — observe and validate how one of those jobs happens now when current reality is unclear.
  3. Process Modelling — turn a validated as-is map into a testable intended process when the desired control is unclear.
  4. Checklists — install a short control at the pause point where a critical omission can change the outcome.
  5. Quality Assurance — prevent defects, enforce invariants, preserve expert judgment, and verify release evidence.
  6. Business Process Reengineering — redesign from first principles when the existing process cannot reach the required outcome.

Zoom Out​

Context​

  • depends-on Standards — supplies the approved setpoint and evidence contract that make variance meaningful.
  • proved-by Performance — supplies the observed gauge and later evidence of baseline lift.
  • applies-to Evolution — offers correction methods; Evolution owns acceptance, authority, retention, and the higher baseline.
  • pairs-with Control System — names the gauge, correction lever, cadence, and authority.

Changes my mind: a child method no longer owns a distinct reader decision or the sequence stops helping a cold reader choose correctly.

  • depends-on Systems — see the wider systems, feedback, and control terrain.
  • applies-to Performance Reality — define the gauge that shows whether the next run improved.

Questions​

Next question: What is unclear now—which work exists, its reality, the intended design, a critical control, release confidence, or structural capability?

  • Which route would a cold reader choose for a process that is understood but structurally incapable?