Cash Flow Model
NeededRevenue, delivery cost, burn, runway, scenarios, break-even, and kill thresholds.
Cannot fill — no stakeholders engaged, no funding stack modelled, no site secured.
A Denmark ↔ Aotearoa idea bridge — importing proven Copenhagen patterns (bike-first streets, food-market culture, public-realm-as-asset) to grow liveable NZ town economies, starting with Ōrewa.
AI-native business plan
Copenhagen ↔ Aotearoa is not just a pitch. A venture folder should show the idea, the economics, the go-to-market path, the AI leverage, the delivery loop, and the proof gates needed to run it. Missing artifacts stay visible until they are authored.
Artifacts
0
Covered
4
Needed
5
Revenue, delivery cost, burn, runway, scenarios, break-even, and kill thresholds.
Cannot fill — no stakeholders engaged, no funding stack modelled, no site secured.
Ideal customer profile, wedge, channels, acquisition loop, 90-day plan, and conversion proof.
Zero stakeholder conversations held (Hibiscus Bays board, mana whenua, operators).
Where AI creates leverage, what remains human judgment, and what data compounds.
Outcomes-as-a-service governance for a community asset — measure footfall, modal split, local-supplier share; route incentives to town-level goals.
Packages, price points, first paid unit, margins, and the smallest sellable promise.
TBD — likely project/asset, not MRR
The diagnostic or proof asset that turns interest into a named prospect.
Missing from the public operating model. This is the next planning gap to author.
Founder readiness, pain evidence, demand signals, risk gates, and next experiment.
Covered on this overview from venture data.
Business principles, constraints, leverage, distribution, and what not to optimize.
Missing from the public operating model. This is the next planning gap to author.
How the business runs week to week: learn, sell, deliver, measure, improve, teach.
Run one field scan of the Ōrewa town centre; map sites, flows, underused carparks.
Metrics, evidence state, proof gaps, reactivation conditions, and kill criteria.
Founder moat real; demand and site unproven
Planning standard: cash flow model, go-to-market plan, AI strategy, offer/pricing, lead magnet, validation checklist, principles audit, operating loop, and proof/kill signals. Business instruments hold the reusable templates; venture folders hold the business-specific plan.
Playbook depth
Venture pages should stay specific to the business. When a reader needs depth, context, reusable templates, or the operating model behind the bet, route them into the playbook instead of adding another local nav layer.
Use this for the country pattern source behind the Copenhagen side of the bridge.
Use this for the Aotearoa context where the pattern must be adapted.
Use this for land, regulation, competitive dynamics, and property constraints.
Use this for outcomes-as-a-service governance and measurable public-realm value.
Use this for footfall, modal split, local-supplier share, and operating proof.
Why does this matter?
When AI levels intelligence, culture is the human edge — and liveable towns are where culture lives.
What truths guide you?
Copenhagen proved the pattern; adapt it to Aotearoa, never copy-paste.
What do you control?
Field scan, stakeholder talks, concept sketch, funding model.
What do you see others don't?
Modal split + footfall + local-supplier share are the asset's real KPIs, not rent.
How do you know it's working?
Each measured outcome compounds the case for the next block.
Concept only — no field scan, no stakeholders
Zero stakeholders engaged
$0 revenue, $0 funding secured
The first demonstrator: a bike-first beach village where you can ride to a curated food square in five minutes from anywhere in town. A central plaza of 15–30 small food concepts (Torvehallerne / Reffen scaled to Ōrewa), protected cycle lanes linking beach, schools, and transit, and a community-aligned governance structure that holds the asset and measures outcomes — not just rent.
Anchored in Aotearoa strengths: the Ōrewa community garden as a supply + education node, Ōrewa College food programs as a recurring market presence, and local provenance from NZ producers — adapted to te ao Māori, not copy-pasted from Denmark.
No stakeholder appetite
Month 3Zero first meetings (board, mana whenua, operators) in 90 days
No viable site
Month 3No town-centre site or carpark conversion identifiable
No co-funding model
Month 6Cannot articulate a model council/community will co-fund
What is the first concrete step — a site/land scan, or a paper prototype of the food square's business + governance model?