Skip to main content

DePIN Business Models

Not Your Model, Not Your Mind

AI concentrates power with the few, Crypto shares power with the masses.

Industry Applications​

  1. Telecommunications
  2. Energy and utilities
  3. Transportation and logistics
  4. Smart cities
  5. Healthcare

Value Proposition​

Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks aim to address several critical issues inherent in traditional centralized infrastructure systems.

  • Centralization and Monopolization Traditional infrastructure networks are often controlled by a few large entities, leading to monopolization, high costs, and limited innovation. DePIN projects decentralize control, distributing authority and management across a network of participants. This democratizes access and fosters a more competitive and innovative environment.
  • Security and Privacy Risks Centralized systems are vulnerable to single points of failure and cyber-attacks, which can compromise security and privacy. DePIN projects enhance security by distributing data and control across multiple nodes, reducing the risk of breaches and ensuring data integrity through blockchain technology.
  • High Operational Costs Maintaining centralized infrastructure can be expensive due to the need for significant capital investment and ongoing maintenance. DePIN projects reduce costs by leveraging a decentralized model where participants contribute resources and are incentivized through token rewards. This model aligns with market economy principles, reducing waste and operational expenses.
  • Lack of Transparency Centralized systems often suffer from opaque operations, leading to trust issues among users. DePIN projects utilize blockchain's transparent and immutable ledger to ensure all transactions and data exchanges are visible and verifiable, enhancing trust and accountability.
  • Scalability Issues As infrastructure networks grow, centralized systems can struggle with scalability, leading to performance bottlenecks and high transaction costs. DePIN projects address scalability by distributing the load across a decentralized network, allowing for more efficient scaling and lower latency.
  • Interoperability Challenges Traditional infrastructure systems often lack interoperability, making it difficult to integrate with other systems and technologies. DePIN projects focus on creating interoperable solutions that can seamlessly communicate and exchange data across different blockchain networks and traditional systems.
  • Regulatory and Compliance Barriers Navigating regulatory landscapes can be challenging for centralized systems, especially in sectors like telecommunications and energy. DePIN projects aim to create decentralized solutions that can operate within regulatory frameworks while providing greater flexibility and compliance.

Tokenomics​

Medallions aim to create real-world value by adapting to real-world conditions, avoiding the downsides of traditional vote-escrow tokenomics. Medallions provide novel staking mechanism designed to address the complexities and limitations of traditional vote-escrow tokenomics, particularly in decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePINs). Tokenomic strategies for DePIN networks. Three roles for AI tokens:

  • Facilitating transactions
  • Protocol governance
  • Incentivize users

Mechanism​

  • Minting: Stakers lock tokens to mint medallions, with the number of tokens required increasing along a bonding curve.
  • Delegation: Medallions can be delegated to regions to earn a proportional share of regional revenues or capacity, weighted by time-under-delegation.
  • Flexibility: Medallions can be transferred, traded, un-staked, or re-delegated at any time.

Advantages​

  1. Incentives:
    • Long-Term Alignment: Medallion holders are incentivized to stake tokens as soon as possible and for as long as possible.
    • Re-Delegation: Holders are encouraged to re-delegate to higher-yielding regions, aligning incentives with network success rather than short-term gains.
  2. Market-Driven Signals: Market-implied yields on medallions can indicate the relative cost of capital for different regions or technologies.
  3. Economic Focus: Medallions focus on maximizing revenues or capacity rather than market cap, avoiding the fragmentation of decentralized governance.
  4. Generalizability: The medallion system can be adapted to different contexts beyond geographic regions.
  5. Avoiding Governance Issues: Medallions are economic instruments without governance power, preventing the compounding issues of fragmented governance.

Market Opportunity​

  • Identify the target market size and growth potential
  • Assess the competitive landscape
  • Evaluate the potential for disruption in the industry
  • Determine the unique value proposition of the DePIN solution

Regulatory Compliance​

  • Identify relevant regulations in target markets
  • Assess the project's compliance with data protection laws
  • Evaluate the legal implications of tokenizing physical assets
  • Determine the need for licenses or permits

Security Measures​

  • Evaluate the network's resistance to attacks and vulnerabilities
  • Assess the data privacy and protection mechanisms
  • Review the smart contract audit reports
  • Determine the disaster recovery and business continuity plans

Community and Adoption​

  • Assess the size and engagement of the project's community
  • Evaluate the onboarding process for new participants
  • Determine the network effects and growth potential
  • Analyze the project's marketing and outreach strategies

Team and Partnerships​

  • Evaluate the team's expertise in blockchain and relevant industries
  • Assess key partnerships and collaborations
  • Review the project's advisors and their contributions
  • Determine the long-term commitment of the core team

Financial Viability​

  • Review the project's funding and financial resources
  • Assess the revenue model and potential for profitability
  • Evaluate the project's burn rate and runway
  • Determine the potential for future funding or investment