Prompt Deck
The glue between ideas and execution. Five cards that compress your world into what matters — rendered on PRD pages, venture pages, the app, landing pages, marketing sites, and diagnostics. One component, every context. The structure is deterministic (five positions never change), the content is probabilistic (emerges through team competition and blind voting). Solo mode fills the grid. Multiplayer mode validates it.
Why should I care?
Five cards that sell the dream
The instrument and the wiring are not the same thing.
Frontstage
The coaching instrument
A prompt in the right direction when you need it most. Senses drift, fires the right question, shows the depth. The user sees potential they couldn't see before. That's what a great coach does.
Backstage
The 5x5 grid editor
Create slides, edit prompts, manage content. Admin only. This is what currently lives at /insights/priorities. Users should never see the wiring — only hear the music.
Same five positions. Different seat. The customer sees the dream. The builder sees the process.
How does this get built?
Five cards that sell the process
The pitch is the shape. The flow diagrams prove the thinking. The VV stories validate the value.
Problem
People compress their world into five things that matter — strategy offsites, venture plans, life transitions — then lose the compression. Every tool (Notion, Miro, slides) creates clarity once, then the artifact freezes. 2% flow efficiency. Step 5 (Update) never happens.
A living instrument where the 5x5 grid persists, empty cells highlight gaps as strategy, and weekly return makes the grid sharper each pass. Compression that compounds instead of decays. Each card is a heading + image (mantra) that links to deeper thought chains in /docs/.
The frontstage (coaching instrument) and backstage (admin grid) are conflated. The live app at dreamineering.com/insights/priorities shows the backstage — a 5x5 CRUD editor. Users need the frontstage: a prompt in the right direction when you need it most.
Getting someone to return. Every journaling app, strategy tool, and planning instrument dies at the same point — the first week after the first fill. D7 return is the make-or-break metric because without it, this is a novelty, not an instrument.
Scorecard
Priority (5P)
Readiness (5R)
What Exists
| Component | State |
|---|---|
| PromptDeck container | Working |
| Slide component | Working |
| SlideDepth links | Working |
| 15 implementations | Working |
| Visual treatment | Broken |
| Persistence layer | Missing |
| Image generation | Missing |
| Cinematic design prompt | Working |
Relationships
| PRD | Contributes |
|---|---|
| Time + Mind | Fractal pair: Prompt Deck = WHAT to hold in mind. Time+Mind = WHEN to wear which hat. Same five positions, different instrument. |
| Marketing Site Generator | Every generated marketing site has a diagnostic — which IS a Prompt Deck scoring across dimensions. |
| Better Practice | Gamified blind voting on practices IS the Prompt Deck multiplayer mode. Same thesis: validated through group testing. |
| Identity & Access | Auth dependency for persistence and team voting. |
| Agent Platform | Agents need prompt decks too — same instrument, different user. |
| Sales CRM | PromptDeck renders on CRM PRD page and in sales presentations. |
| Multi-Tenant Platform | Prompt Deck game needs app context (which venture), org context (which team), user context (who submitted). Three-entity model. |
10 external users fill a grid. If zero return within 7 days, it's a novelty, not an instrument. Stop building and revisit the job.
Questions
If the hidden narrator is the first audience, did creating this PRD change your conviction — or just arrange existing words?
- Which of the 15 existing implementations best proves the pitch+prompt pattern — and what makes it work?
- When the dynamic version ships (persistence, D7 return), will people return because of Zeigarnik or despite it?
- What's the gap between the static instrument (working now) and the living instrument (the product vision)?