Touch For Fun — Prompt Deck

What would change if your next group session left people feeling genuinely safer with each other?

Five cards. Each has a pitch (bullets that sell) and a prompt (question that hooks). The prompt links to full depth and the facilitation service.

Each card loads one or more behavioural biases — not to manipulate, but to match how people actually decide to trust.

1Principles

AI thinks. Humans must feel together.

What will you do with the in-person time you still have — before AI makes human presence the scarcest resource of all?

AI compresses cognitive work — what's left is coordination and belonging
Organisations spend thousands on retreats that reset to baseline in two weeks
Remote-first teams meet once a year and wonder why trust is fragile
The isolation epidemic is documented — but nobody has infrastructure for fixing it
This window, where embodied connection is scarce, is widening

Biases: Loss aversion (the retreats already spent, the trust already lost) + Confirmation (they already sense this is real)

Full depth: Problem & Why Now

Picture

Name the Pain

2Performance

Consent makes connection safe to repeat.

What consent process will you run before your next group session — or will you improvise again?

Most team-building fails because it's optional, awkward, or one-off
The root cause isn't lack of goodwill — it's lack of a safe protocol
Consent-first design removes the awkwardness that stops people from connecting
Repeated ritual is the mechanism — not a single workshop
What compounds is the habit, not the event

Biases: IKEA effect (co-create the ritual, own the result) + Zeigarnik (the loop won't close until you try it)

Full depth: The Thesis

Picture

Diagnose Root Cause

3Platform

Trust is measurable. Not just felt.

Will you measure trust in your next session — or leave it to feeling?

We don't run a fun event. We run a measurement experiment
Pre/post trust scale: before the session and after, every time
Facilitator-ready kits: protocols, consent process, measurement forms included
$300 Session Kit: everything to run your first measured session in two hours
The framework is the product — not just the facilitation

Biases: Reciprocity (give the measurement framework first) + Confirmation (they already believe trust matters, we prove it)

Full depth: Solution & Product

Picture

Provide a Framework

4Process

Protocols beat good intentions every time.

Are you building infrastructure or relying on personality — and what happens when that person leaves?

Good intentions don't survive facilitator turnover
Protocols do — they compound across people, groups, and time
Team building providers deliver entertainment. We deliver infrastructure
Corporate L&D measures learning retention. We measure trust delta
Every cohort that proves the protocol becomes the case for the next

Biases: Fear sells (the next facilitator leaves, the culture resets) + Hyperbolic discounting (the near-term ritual habit is vivid; make it concrete)

Full depth: Market & Defensibility

Picture

Prioritize & Coordinate

5Players

Rituals compound. Retreats don't.

Are you in? One session. One measurement. See if the delta is real.

The only metric: trust delta before and after every session
60% gross margins across all tiers
Repeat attendance rate above 50% by Month 3 — or we redesign the protocol
Kill gates at every milestone — we say so upfront
Every number PROJECTED — and we're honest about it

Biases: Zeigarnik (you'll calculate your own session frequency after reading this) + Decision fatigue (one north star metric, not twelve)

Full depth: Unit Economics

Picture

Package the Engagement

1 / 5

The Stack

The pitch is the protocol. The prompt is the hook. The linked page is the evidence.

Layer	What it does	Bias engine
Pitch (bullets)	Sells — confirms what they already feel about connection	Confirmation, loss aversion, fear
Prompt (question)	Hooks — opens a loop they can't close without running a session	Zeigarnik, hyperbolic discounting
Link (full depth)	Nets — co-creates, gives the framework first, builds proof	IKEA effect, reciprocity

Context

Business Plan — Full depth behind each card
Feedback — Five KPIs and decision-action processes
Behavioural Biases — The engine loaded into each card
Prompt Deck — The instrument pattern this implements
Touch Rugby — The sport that seeded the ritual library

Questions

Does each prompt question create enough tension to book a session — or does the pitch already satisfy the curiosity?

Which card would make a community organiser lean forward — and which would make them close the deck?
If someone reads only the five prompts as standalone questions, do they tell a coherent story about trust?
Which bias pairing is weakest — where are we claiming a psychological mechanism without earning it?

AI thinks. Humans must feel together.

The Stack​

Context​

Questions​

The Stack

Context

Questions