Skip to main content

Commissioning Dashboard

The factory floor control panel. One view of every capability: what's specified, what's built, what's proven.

In factory engineering, the team that builds a system is never the team that commissions it. The builder knows what they intended. The commissioner checks what actually shipped.


Capability Status Matrix

Every Mycelium capability, scored on a 5-level maturity scale:

LevelMeaningEvidence Required
L0Spec onlyPRD written, no build
L1Schema + APIBackend exists, no interface
L2UI connectedUsers can interact
L3TestedAutomated verification passes
L4CommissionedIndependent verification against PRD criteria

Active Capabilities

Table order = build order. Matches Active table.

PRDCapabilityLevelComponentsBuiltTestedCommissionedKill DateNext Action
Agent PlatformIdentity, memory, comms, dispatch, VVFLL1389 (24%)PartialNoWire ETL path + consolidate agent infra
Sales CRM and RFPDemand-driven CRM + RFPL22214 (64%)0Partial (2026-02-18)2026-03-24Sprint 0: Wire 3 dormant algos + Stripe
Sales Dev AgentAI-powered demand generationL1137 (54%)0No2026-03-24Sprint -1: Prove email + LinkedIn live, then S0: ETL --path, S1: Agent profile
Sales Process OptimisationProcess intelligence + agent teamL0700NoSpec complete. Depends on CRM Sprint 0.
ETL Data ToolUniversal data readinessL21210 (83%)7 (58%)No
Agency LayerAI-Native Agency (90/10 split)L15No
Content AmplifierMulti-platform distributionL1123 (25%)0NoWire SPCL + Marketing Strategy WC
Data InterfaceThree-interface data accessL0600No
Prompt DeckAlignment instrumentL171 (14%)0No
Make Meetings MatterStructured meeting state changesL0800No
Sui Wallet SafetyWallet safety standardsL180 UI (5 clients)0No
Time + MindIntention/Attention calendarL01000No
Trust CommerceCoach-selling + on-chain reputationL0700NoSpec complete. Needs demand validation (10 conversations).
DePIN InfrastructureMulti-chain device + data + rewardsL000No

Backlog Capabilities

PRDCapabilityLevelComponentsNotes
Workflow EngineDecision engine for work receiptsL19Backend ~80% complete, UI 0%
Workflow BuilderVisual workflow editorL010Blocked on engine UI
Commissioning State MachineProgressive data maturity automationL06This dashboard is the manual version
Drawing ToolA&ID visual languageL08Figma diagrams exist, no tool
Social Media MarketingLinkedIn-first B2B automationL010Spec written, not started

Platform Capabilities

PRDCapabilityLevelComponentsNotes
Identity & AccessMulti-tenant auth, RBAC, org isolationL154 checklist items22% passing — schema built, wiring broken. PostgreSQL 22P02 blocks owner
Intelligence FunctionsPure decision logic, zero infra depsL06Pure functions, no build yet

Aggregate Health

MetricCountPercentage
Total capabilities14
L0 (Spec only)857%
L1 (Schema + API)424%
L2 (UI connected)212%
L3 (Tested)00%
L4 (Commissioned)00%
Total components across all PRDs128
Components with Schema done~35~27%
Components with UI done~16~12%
Components with Tests done~7~5%

The system has depth in two capabilities (CRM/RFP and ETL) and breadth in specifications. Nothing has reached L3 (tested) or L4 (commissioned) yet.


Flight Readiness Gates

Before any capability ships to production, it must pass eight gates. Adapted from factory pre-flight inspection.

GateCriteriaTestApplies To
G1: ConfigVersion locked, zero uncommitted changesgit status clean on deploy branchAll
G2: TypesZero TypeScript errors, strict modepnpm nx typecheck [app]All
G3: SecurityAuth + rate limits + CSP configuredAction validation auditAll
G4: TestsPass rate above threshold, documented skipspnpm nx test [app]All
G5: PerformanceP95 response time within budgetLatency measurement under loadAll with UI
G6: ObservabilityFour Golden Signals monitoredLatency, Traffic, Errors, SaturationProduction apps
G7: AI SafetyPrompt injection mitigated, hallucination boundedValidation layer auditAI capabilities
G8: Ops ReadyRollback tested, runbook existsDeployment verificationProduction apps

Four Golden Signals (G6)

SignalMetricThreshold
LatencyP95 response timeUnder 3s API, under 10s AI
TrafficConcurrent usersOver 50 supported
ErrorsError rateUnder 5%
SaturationFunction timeoutUnder 80%

Current Gate Status (Sales CRM — only app in production)

GateStatusEvidence
G1: ConfigPassVercel auto-deploy on main
G2: TypesPasspnpm nx typecheck drmg-sales
G3: SecurityPass17/17 actions validated
G4: TestsPassApp 92.5%, Repos 96.2%
G5: PerformancePassStreaming response under 2s start
G6: ObservabilityPassRAG metrics + HiTL dashboard
G7: AI SafetyPassZod validation, confidence scores
G8: Ops ReadyPassVercel instant rollback

No other capability has reached the gate stage yet.


Revenue Readiness

Capabilities ordered by proximity to generating revenue.

CapabilityRevenue ModelPricingStageBlockers
Sales CRM and RFPSaaS subscriptionFree / $199 Pro / $999 EnterpriseDemo-ready, no paying customersCustomer validation (1 of 5 interviews), win rate tracking
Sui Wallet SafetyOpen standard + paid integrationFree reference / paid reviewPatterns built, no commercial offerWallet UI gap, no integration partners yet
ETL Data ToolPlatform infrastructureInternalShipping internallyNo external-facing offer
Prompt DeckSaaSTBDPrototypeGrid engine only, no full product

RFP: The Wedge

The closest capability to revenue. Key metrics:

MetricClaimWhat Actually Matters
Time savings24h to 4h (83% reduction)Table stakes — every AI tool claims speed
Auto-fill rate0% to 70%Good, but not the point
Prediction accuracyNot tracked"80% confidence" should mean 80% win
Win rate improvementNot tracked5% improvement on $50M = $2M value

Speed is a feature. Accuracy is the product. Win rate is the proof.

Kill Criteria (90 Days: 2026-03-24)

CriterionThresholdCurrentHow to Measure
Zero paying customers0 = KILL0Stripe dashboard
Auto-fill rate stagnantUnder 50% at 12 weeksPending/admin/approved-answers metrics
SME queue overflowOver 100 itemsPending/admin/sme-review count
Receipt value below 10x subscriptionUnder 10x = KILLPendingRFP savings vs subscription
Win rate unchangedNo improvementPendingBefore/after adoption comparison

Infrastructure Backlog

Shared infrastructure that multiple capabilities depend on.

InfrastructureRequired ByStatusPriority
Embedded Payments (Stripe)All revenuePhase 10.1 complete (backend), webhook handlers pendingP0
A2A ProtocolWorkflow Engine, Agent CommsTier 1 tests passing (12/12), Tier 2 readyP1
Real-Time (WebSockets)Agent Comms, dashboardsNot startedP1
Identity/AuthAll venturesFull PRD with 54-item checklist audit. 22% passing. Owner locked out (PostgreSQL 22P02)P0
Compliance FrameworkHealthcare, financial verticalsNot startedP2
Social Media APIsContent Amplifier, Social MediaLinkedIn adapter built, no API credentialsP3

Commissioning Process

How a capability moves from L0 to L4:

L0: SPEC ONLY           L1: SCHEMA + API        L2: UI CONNECTED
PRD written → Backend exists → Users can interact
Features defined Schema deployed CRUD works
Success criteria API endpoints live Workflows complete
Kill signal set Integration tests Manual QA passes

L3: TESTED L4: COMMISSIONED
Automated tests → Independent verification
E2E suite passes Commissioner reads spec
Performance gates Commissioner opens browser
Regression suite Commissioner checks features
Pass / Fail + evidence

Commissioning Protocol

  1. Commissioner reads the PRD (not the code)
  2. Commissioner opens the live application
  3. For each row in the Feature / Function / Outcome table:
    • Can the feature be found?
    • Does the function work as specified?
    • Does the outcome match the success criteria?
  4. Record Pass / Fail with evidence (screenshot, recording, measurement)
  5. Update the PRD commissioning table
  6. If all critical features Pass: capability is L4 Commissioned

The commissioner is never the builder. The builder knows what they intended. The commissioner checks what actually shipped.


Prioritization Algorithm

Full scoring methodology, current PRD scores, hierarchy map, and duplication audit: Work Prioritisation.

Use one standard scoring process for every PRD in this factory.

This follows the Tight Five sequence for business execution:

  1. Principles: is value transformation and distribution explicit?
  2. Performance: are benchmarks and drift triggers defined?
  3. Platform: can we ship on existing operational base?
  4. Protocols: does this create reusable know-how?
  5. Players: is demand real and are the right people onboard?

Scorecard (0-5 each)

DimensionWhat to ScorePass Condition
PrinciplesClear value loop (problem -> trade -> proof -> feedback) and margin logicUnit of value + transfer path are explicit
PerformanceBenchmarks, leading indicators, kill criteria, review cadenceWarn/Fail triggers are written before build
PlatformReuse of existing stack, dependency risk, time to first shipCan reach L2 without net-new core infra
ProtocolsSOP reuse potential, standardization value, cross-cap portabilityCreates or upgrades shared process assets
PlayersCustomer pain, partner pull, operator readiness, commissioner availability5 real interviews or equivalent evidence exists

Weighted Priority Score

Use this weighted formula:

PRIORITY_SCORE =
(0.20 * Principles) +
(0.25 * Performance) +
(0.20 * Platform) +
(0.15 * Protocols) +
(0.20 * Players)

Why this weighting:

  • Performance is highest weight because unmeasured work drifts.
  • Principles/Platform/Players are equal core constraints.
  • Protocols still matter, but after value, measurement, and demand are clear.

Hard Gates (No Gate, No Build)

If any gate fails, priority is HOLD regardless of score.

GateRequired EvidenceResult if Missing
Benchmark GateThresholds defined from Benchmark StandardsHOLD
Commissioning GateFeature/Function/Outcome table with pass/fail checksHOLD
Owner GateNamed builder + named commissioner (different people)HOLD
Kill GateExplicit kill date and kill criteriaHOLD
Data GateBaseline measurement exists before changeHOLD

Decision Bands

Score BandDecisionAction
>= 4.0Ship NowAllocate current cycle
3.0-3.9PrepareClose missing dependencies, then rescore
2.0-2.9IncubateKeep in backlog, gather evidence
< 2.0StopDrop or rewrite problem framing

Drift Control (Factory Cadence)

Run this every week for active PRDs:

  1. Recompute Priority Score
  2. Evaluate benchmark state: Pass / Warn / Fail
  3. Trigger action:
    • Pass -> continue or promote standard
    • Warn -> corrective loop and retest in 7 days
    • Fail -> freeze rollout, rollback, or kill
  4. Log the decision and evidence in this dashboard

This keeps prioritization aligned with construction/manufacturing discipline: standard fittings, measurable tolerances, and independent inspection.


Next Actions

Ordered by ROI — highest leverage moves first. Kill date: 2026-03-24 (28 days).

Tier 0: Prove Outbound + Unblock Agent Profiles (3.5 days engineering)

ActionCapabilityWhy NowEffort
Go live with Resend email (set 3 env vars + webhook endpoint)Sales Dev AgentCode path complete. Config only. Proves email delivery end-to-end.0.5 day
Replace LinkedIn mock client with real API + OAuthSales Dev AgentAdapter is 95% real (1043 lines). Mock is ~50 lines. Register app Day 1, code in parallel.2.5 days
Wire email send + LinkedIn post to auto-create CRM activitiesSales Dev AgentEvery outbound touchpoint must appear in CRM timeline.0.5 day
Add --path flag to agent-etl-cli.tsAgent Platform~20 lines. Unblocks ALL future agent profiles including Sales Dev Agent.0.5 day

Tier 1: Wire for Revenue (~6 days engineering)

ActionCapabilityWhy NowEffort
Wire Sales Forecasting → forecast pageSales CRM and RFPAlgorithm + page exist, pure wiring. Prediction is the product.1 day
Wire Compound Rate Tracking → RFP analyticsSales CRM and RFPAlgorithm + page exist. Shows compounding thesis to prospects.1 day
Wire RFP Type Detection → upload flowSales CRM and RFPAlgorithm + upload exist. Auto-classify documents on upload.2 days
Wire Stripe webhooks → production paymentsSales CRM and RFPBackend complete. Can't collect revenue without payment flow.2 days

Tier 1.5: Build Sales Dev Agent (~14 days engineering, parallel with Tier 1)

ActionCapabilityWhy NowEffort
Create agent profile (8 JSON files) + load via ETL CLISales Dev AgentPhygital being identity. Docs at /docs/players/phygital-beings/sales-dev-agent/.1 day
Build Prospect Research ServiceSales Dev AgentCompose from DocumentIntelligence + platform-industry-trends.2 days
Wire Lead Scoring (sales-forecasting + explore-exploit)Sales Dev AgentBoth algorithms exist. Composition layer only.2 days
Build Outreach Composer + SPCL quality gateSales Dev AgentNew service following RFP answer gen pattern. SPCL algo exists.3 days
Build Follow-up Sequencer + CRM auto-loggingSales Dev AgentUses existing CRM tasks + email/LinkedIn adapters.3 days
Build Outreach WorkChart (5-stage orchestration)Sales Dev AgentFollows RFP workflow pattern. Ties S1-S4 together.2 days
Build Channel Performance DashboardSales Dev AgentData from email webhooks + LinkedIn analytics.1 day

Tier 2: Wire for Agent Amplifier Position (~11 days engineering)

ActionCapabilityWhy NowEffort
Wire SPCL Scoring → content quality gateContent AmplifierAlgorithm exists. Quality gate before publish.2 days
Wire Marketing Strategy Workflow → UIContent AmplifierWorkChart exists. Market analysis + channel recs + budget.1 week
Wire Marketing Loyalty Workflow → UIContent AmplifierWorkChart exists. Points, attribution, tiers.2 days

Tier 3: Close the Loop

ActionCapabilityWhy NowEffort
Get first paying customerSales CRM and RFPKill date. Sales, not engineering.
Commission CRM formallySales CRM and RFPPartial inspection 2026-02-18, needs full L41 day
Wire AI Tuning Loop → Eval RunnerAgency LayerSelf-improving AI accuracy3 days

Context