How did we arrive at this proposal — and how do we track that value is delivered?
| Map | Question | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome Map | What does success look like? | 4 binary measures. 80% built, gap is wiring not architecture. |
| Value Stream Map | Where does time die? | ~10% flow efficiency — developer intervention on every onboard. Second user flow is a dead end. |
| Dependency Map | What must happen first? | 3 hard deps (all Tier 0), parallelizable. Blocks every downstream PRD. |
| Capability Map | What can we actually do? | 14 capabilities: 4 at maturity 4, 4 at zero. 22% checklist passing. |
| A&ID | How do agents orchestrate? | 4 agents, 6 instruments, 4 loops. Auth loop working, authz loop broken — sensor bypassed, actuator missing. |
Templates: Pictures Templates
The Bridge
Pictures sit between sales and engineering. The prompt deck sells the vision. These five maps prove the thinking is sound.
| Prompt Deck (sells) | Pictures (explains) |
|---|---|
| "The owner can't get in" | Outcome: 4 binary success measures |
| "789 errors, zero revenue" | Value Stream: ~10% flow efficiency, dead end for second user |
| "80% built, 0% working" | Capability: 14 capabilities, 4/14 at maturity 4, architecture flows |
| "Every venture waits" | Dependency: 3 hard deps, all parallelizable |
| "Builder locked out" | A&ID: auth loop works, authz loop broken, 5 JTBD, role definitions |
Context
- Identity & Access PRD — Decision surface
- Prompt Deck — Sales: five cards, scannable
- Pictures Templates — Empty patterns to fill