Capability Map: Work Charts & Builder
1. Platform Capabilities
| Capability | Maturity (0-5) | Gaps / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Capability Matcher | 4 | Exists in Engine, matches skills to agents |
| Confidence Scorer | 4 | Exists in Engine, scores AI output confidence |
| Workflow Execution Schema | 3 | schema-jobs exists. Needs trigger infra and task templates. |
| Visual Composition | 0 | The Builder UI canvas/panels is 0% complete |
| Triggers (Cron/Event) | 0 | Core gap for Phase 3 Work Charts automation |
| Performance AI Tuning | 1 | Tracking of quality score exists, but routing to ai-tuning-loop is pending. |
Questions
Which capability in the workflow and process mgt map is the hardest to replicate — and does that make it the moat?
- Which capabilities are table-stakes (must have) vs differentiators (competitive edge) — and is the build order aligned?
- If a new competitor entered with 10x engineering resources, which capabilities would they copy first and which would they build differently?
- Which capability gap, once closed, would unlock the most other capabilities?