Outcome Map: Workflow Builder & Work Charts
1. Desired Outcome
Ops Managers and Business Analysts can visually construct, test, and deploy AI-powered Work Charts (workflows) in under 10 minutes without developer assistance. The Workflow Engine assigns tasks dynamically (AI vs Human) and produces structured job outcome receipts.
2. Success Measures
- Time-to-workflow: < 10 minutes
- Non-technical builder rate: > 70%
- First-attempt success rate: > 60%
- Template adoption rate: > 40%
- AI % Trend: Upward trend, tracked per stage
3. Roles (RACI)
- Ops Manager: Responsible (Builds the workflows visually, monitors executions)
- Workflow Engine: Accountable (Executes the capabilities, assigns agents, scores confidence)
- AI Agent: Consulted / Executes (Completes task steps assigned by Capability Matcher)
- Platform Engineering: Informed / Consulted (Maintains the Skill Registry and platform infrastructure)
Questions
Which outcome in the workflow and process mgt map is the leading indicator — the one that reliably predicts all others?
- Which outcome is hardest to measure but most important to track — and what proxy metric comes closest?
- If the primary outcome were achieved but secondary outcomes lagged, what would that signal about the system?
- At what threshold does each outcome shift from "in progress" to "proven" — and who decides that threshold?