Skip to main content

Payments Players

Who captures value in the transformation from extraction to efficiency.

Player Categories

CategoryRole in TransformationValue Capture Trend
Card NetworksIncumbent extraction, consumer lock-inDefending
Correspondent BanksLegacy cross-border, friction layerDisintermediated
Stablecoin IssuersNew rails, regulatory complianceGrowing
Off-Ramp ProvidersLast mile, corridor specialistsGrowing
Treasury IntegratorsB2B adoption, EBITDA optimizationEmerging

Traditional Players

Card Networks

PlayerRoleBusiness ModelMarket Position
VisaCard networkInterchange (2-3%)Duopoly, $8T+ volume
MastercardCard networkInterchange (2-3%)Duopoly, $7T+ volume
AmexNetwork + issuerInterchange + feesPremium segment
DiscoverNetwork + issuerInterchangeUS-centric

Defense strategy: Rewards loops keep consumers locked. Stablecoins must route around, not through.

Correspondent Banking

PlayerRoleBusiness ModelVulnerability
SWIFTMessaging networkPer-message feesSpeed, transparency
JPMorganCorrespondent bankFX spreads, wire feesDirect stablecoin rails
CitiCorrespondent bankFX spreads, wire feesDirect stablecoin rails
HSBCCorrespondent bankFX spreads, wire feesDirect stablecoin rails

Vulnerability: 3-4% friction stack is the target. Every basis point saved flows to stablecoin rails.

Payment Processors

PlayerRoleCrypto StrategyStatus
StripeMerchant processingBridge acquisition ($1.1B)Aggressive
PayPalConsumer + merchantPYUSD stablecoinHybrid
Square/BlockSMB + consumerBitcoin focus, Cash AppSelective
AdyenEnterprise processingLimited cryptoWatching

Stablecoin Rails

Issuers

PlayerTokenMarket CapRegulatory StatusBest For
CircleUSDC$30B+US-regulated, publicCompliance-first B2B
TetherUSDT$100B+Offshore, contestedAsia, liquidity
PaxosPYUSDGrowingNY-regulatedPayPal ecosystem
First DigitalFDUSDGrowingHong KongBinance ecosystem

Off-Ramp Providers

PlayerFocusCorridorsStatusDifferentiation
BridgeStablecoin orchestrationGlobal, mature🟢 Stripe acq.API elegance, Stripe
BVNKB2B payments100+ countries🟢 GrowingCorridor depth
DeelGlobal payroll150+ countries🟢 GrowingHR integration
AirwallexB2B treasury150+ countries🟢 GrowingBanking integration
NiumEmbedded payments100+ countries🟢 GrowingBaaS model

Infrastructure

PlayerFocusFunctionStatus
FireblocksCustody + signingWallet infra🟢 Enterprise
AnchorageRegulated custodyInstitutional🟢 OCC charter
Circle MintUSDC mint/redeemOn/off-ramp🟢 Direct

Treasury Integrators

The emerging category that captures stablecoin alpha for traditional businesses.

PE Firms

PlayerStrategyValue Creation Lever
General catalystFintech portfolio, treasury opsEBITDA optimization
Vista EquitySoftware focus, B2B paymentsOperational efficiency
Thoma BravoFintech, payments infrastructureIntegration playbook
(Your firm here)Mid-market w/ cross-border exposure13-19% EBITDA lift

CFO Consultants

PlayerSegmentService
Treasury advisoryEnterpriseWorking capital optimization
FX specialistsMid-marketCross-border treasury
Fintech consultantsGrowth companiesPayments infrastructure

ERP Vendors

PlayerIntegration StatusStablecoin Readiness
SAPS/4HANA🟡 Plugin ecosystem
OracleNetSuite, ERP Cloud🟡 Partner integrations
MicrosoftDynamics 365🔴 Early
CoupaAP automation🟡 Partner integrations
Bill.comSMB AP/AR🟡 Crypto pilots

Ecosystem Map

Value Chain Position

SENDER (US Company)

├─► ERP SYSTEM (SAP, Oracle, NetSuite)
│ │
│ ▼
│ ROUTING ENGINE (The opportunity)
│ │
│ ├─► SWIFT Rail ──────────► Correspondent Banks ──► Supplier
│ │
│ └─► Stablecoin Rail
│ │
│ ▼
│ ON-RAMP (Circle)
│ │
│ ▼
│ BLOCKCHAIN (Solana, Base)
│ │
│ ▼
│ OFF-RAMP (Bridge, BVNK)
│ │
│ ▼
└─────────────────► SUPPLIER BANK (Local fiat)

Competitive Dynamics

PositionCurrent LeaderDisruption Potential
Consumer checkoutVisa/Mastercard🔴 Low (rewards moat)
B2B domesticACH, cards🟡 Moderate
B2B cross-borderCorrespondent banking🟢 High (stablecoin rails)
PayrollDeel, Papaya, Remote🟢 High (already crypto)
TreasuryBanks🟢 High (CFO pain point)

Investment Thesis by Player Type

For PE/Acquirers

Target profile:

  • $75M+ revenue
  • $30M+ annual cross-border payments
  • Concentrated corridors (top 3 = 70%+ volume)
  • ERP with API access
  • CFO with mandate for treasury optimization

Value creation:

  1. Map current payment friction by corridor
  2. Integrate stablecoin rails (Bridge, BVNK partnership)
  3. Capture 10-20% EBITDA improvement
  4. Repeatable across portfolio

For Builders

White space:

  • Routing intelligence — No dominant player, telecom LCR expertise transfers
  • Treasury dashboard — CFO persona, not crypto UX
  • ERP connectors — Deep integration, not bolt-on
  • Corridor expansion — Emerging markets need local partnerships

Don't build:

  • Another blockchain
  • Consumer wallet
  • Stablecoin issuer (regulated moat)

For Operators

Pilot playbook:

  1. Select highest-volume mature corridor (Mexico, EU)
  2. Route 10% of volume through stablecoin rails
  3. Measure all-in cost delta
  4. Build business case for board
  5. Expand or revert

Why Now

Three catalysts converged in 2025:

CatalystWhat ChangedImpact
Legal clarityGENIUS Act (July 2025) — federal frameworkCFOs can adopt without legal risk
Infrastructure depthBridge, BVNK abstract off-ramp complexity"Send fiat, deliver fiat" APIs
Adoption compoundingB2B stablecoin: $100M → $3B monthly (30x in 2 yrs)Network effects kicking in

The window: Early adopters capture savings while competitors wait for more proof.


Objections and Responses

ObjectionResponse
"Suppliers won't accept crypto"Off-ramp providers deposit local fiat — supplier never touches crypto
"1% off-ramp is optimistic"For mature corridors. Others 2%+, still beats 3-4%
"You're shifting costs to supplier"Net system friction declines; split is negotiable
"What about volatility?"Stablecoins are pegged 1:1; exposure window is hours not days
"Why hasn't everyone done this?"Until July 2025, no federal legal framework. Now there is.

Context