Solar Protocols
Standardized workflows that sequence principles into repeatable methods.
Protocol Categories
| Category | What It Covers | Key Protocols |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Site selection → Install → Verify → Earn | Glow, Starpower |
| Verification | Generation proof → Carbon credit → Distribution | GCC, IoT + satellite |
| Token Economics | Rewards → Burning → Distribution | GLW, GCC |
| Grid Integration | Dispatch → Settlement → Optimization | VPP protocols |
Vertical Expertise
- System Design
- Pricing
- Presentation
System Design
Pricing
Market intelligence.
Proposal
DePIN Deployment Protocol
Glow Farm Deployment
1. QUALIFY
└─► Identify optimal location (high irradiance, low cost)
└─► Verify interconnection pathway
└─► Confirm additionality (new construction only)
2. DEPLOY
└─► Physical installation (panels, inverters, meters)
└─► IoT monitoring equipment
└─► Protocol registration
3. VERIFY
└─► Generation data from IoT meters
└─► Satellite imagery confirmation
└─► Cross-reference with weather data
4. EARN
└─► GLW tokens for verified generation
└─► GCC tokens for carbon avoidance
└─► Electricity revenue (100% to protocol)
5. OPTIMIZE
└─► Performance monitoring
└─► Maintenance scheduling
└─► Yield optimization
Proof of Generation
| Step | Action | Verification |
|---|---|---|
| Measure | IoT meters capture generation data | Hardware attestation |
| Corroborate | Satellite imagery confirms farm activity | Independent observation |
| Validate | Weather data matches expected yield | Physical plausibility |
| Attest | On-chain proof submitted | Blockchain record |
Carbon Credit Protocol
GCC (Glow Carbon Credit)
Tokenized carbon avoidance with cryptographic proof.
1. GENERATION
└─► Verified kWh production
└─► Calculate avoided emissions (grid factor)
└─► Mint GCC tokens (1 GCC = 1 tonne CO2 avoided)
2. VERIFICATION
└─► IoT + satellite proof of generation
└─► Additionality confirmation (new capacity)
└─► Third-party validation (optional)
3. DISTRIBUTION
└─► GCC issued to protocol treasury
└─► Sold to carbon buyers
└─► Proceeds fund more infrastructure
4. RETIREMENT
└─► Buyer retires GCC for offset claims
└─► On-chain retirement record
└─► Immutable audit trail
GCC vs Traditional Carbon Credits
| Aspect | Traditional | GCC |
|---|---|---|
| Verification | Manual audits (annual) | IoT + satellite (continuous) |
| Additionality | Trust-based claims | Cryptographic proof |
| Fees | 30%+ registry fees | <5% protocol fees |
| Transparency | Quarterly reports | Real-time on-chain |
| Settlement | Weeks/months | Instant |
Token Economics Protocol
GLW/GCC Flow
┌──────────────┐
│ Electricity │
│ Revenue │
└──────┬───────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────┐
│ Protocol │
│ Treasury │
└──────┬───────┘
│
┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ GLW │ │ GCC │ │ Recursive │
│ Rewards │ │ Issuance │ │ Deploy │
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘
│ │
▼ ▼
┌──────────┐ ┌───────────── ─┐
│ Farm │ │ Carbon │
│ Operators│ │ Buyers │
└──────────┘ └──────────────┘
Dual Token Model
| Token | Function | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| GLW | Governance and operator rewards | Earned for verified generation |
| GCC | Carbon credit representation | 1 token = 1 tonne CO2 avoided |
The recursive subsidy model creates capital amplification: each $1 invested generates ~$20 of infrastructure.
Design Protocol
System Design Workflow
1. SITE ASSESSMENT
└─► Location coordinates
└─► Available area
└─► Shading analysis
└─► Grid connection status
2. RESOURCE ANALYSIS
└─► Solar irradiance data (GHI, DNI, DHI)
└─► Temperature profiles
└─► Wind data
3. SYSTEM DESIGN
└─► Panel selection and layout
└─► Inverter sizing (DC/AC ratio)
└─► Mounting system
└─► Battery integration (if applicable)
4. FINANCIAL MODELING
└─► LCOE calculation
└─► Token reward projections
└─► GCC value estimates
└─► Payback analysis
5. INTERCONNECTION
└─► Utility application
└─► Queue position tracking
└─► Approval timeline
RFP Data Requirements
| From Customer | What You Generate |
|---|---|
| Address, site plans, structural drawings | System design package |
| Single-line diagrams, 12+ months consumption | Energy production model |
| Ownership preference (PPA, lease, purchase) | Financial analysis |
| Utility interconnection requirements | Interconnection application |
| Desired timeline | Project schedule |
DePIN Networks
| Protocol | Focus | Token | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glow | Industrial solar farms | GLW/GCC | 🟢 Live |
| Daylight Energy | Consumer energy rewards | — | 🟡 Building |
| Starpower | DER coordination | — | 🟡 Building |
| Srcful | Grid edge intelligence | SRCFUL | 🟡 Building |
| React Protocol | Virtual power plants | REACT | 🟡 Building |
Activity-to-Player Matrix
| Activity | Farm Operator | EPC | Utility | DePIN Protocol | Carbon Buyer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site Selection | ● | ○ | ○ | ||
| Installation | ● | ||||
| Generation Verification | ● | ● | |||
| Token Distribution | ● | ||||
| Carbon Credit Purchase | ● | ||||
| Grid Integration | ● | ○ |
● = Primary responsibility | ○ = Supporting role
Deep Dives
- Glow Protocol — Leading DePIN solar protocol
- Energy KPIs — Performance metrics framework
Context
- Performance — How to measure protocol effectiveness
- Players — Who executes these protocols
- DePIN Tokens — Token economics patterns