Skip to main content

Prompt Deck Spec

How do we build an instrument that gets smarter each time someone uses it?

The Tight Five Prompt Deck — 5 priorities x 5 dimensions alignment matrix
The Tight Five Prompt Deck

Build Contract

#FeatureFunctionOutcomeJobState
15x5 Grid (Mission Control)Interactive matrix — click cell, fill itSee everything that matters on one pageJob 1, 2Prototype
2Card View (The Stack)Swipe through one cell at a timeDaily check-in on mobile in 2 minutesJob 3Gap
3Mode ToggleSwitch Pep Talk / PitchSame data, different lensJob 1, 2Gap
4Scale SelectorPersonal / Venture / Industry / PortfolioSame instrument, different scopeJob 1, 3Gap
5Save + PersistenceGrid state persists across sessionsFill today, review next weekAllGap
6Empty Cell HighlightVisual emphasis on gapsGaps become visible strategyAllGap
7SnapshotsSave dated versions, compare over timeWatch priorities evolveJob 1, 3Gap
8TemplatesPre-filled grids for common domainsStart from a pattern, not a blank pageJob 1, 2Gap
9SharePublic link to read-only gridPitch without slidesJob 2Gap
10AI Coaching (Conversation)Suggest questions for empty cellsNew users get guided, not stuckAllGap

Principles

What truths constrain us?

The Job

ElementDetail
SituationSomeone has too many priorities and no way to see which ones connect
IntentionCompress their world into five things that matter — gaps become visible, next move becomes obvious
ObstacleStrategy offsites produce clarity that evaporates. Pitch decks freeze on creation. Journals never compound.

The hidden objection: "What if I pick the wrong five things?" The grid answers that — wrong picks surface fast because the rows won't fill. The instrument corrects itself.

Why Now

Three forces converge:

  1. AI makes compression possible — an agent can help fill cells, suggest questions for gaps
  2. Static pitch decks are dying — investors, teams, and founders want living instruments, not frozen PDFs
  3. The pattern is proven — every industry analysis, venture scorecard, and PRD on this site is an instance of the same 5x5 grid

The prototype exists. Five interaction patterns explored in CDD. The mental model site IS the filled grid at portfolio scale — 1,200+ pages structured on the same 5P pattern.

Design Constraints

ConstraintRationale
5x5 maximumCognitive limit — compression IS the value
Evergreen beats one-shotInstruments compound, documents decay
Gaps are the strategyEmpty cells are features, not bugs

Performance

How do we know it works?

Priority Score

PRIORITY = Pain x Demand x Edge x Trend x Conversion

DimensionScore (1-5)Evidence
Pain4Every founder struggles with alignment. Strategy offsites produce clarity that evaporates.
Demand3Used internally across 7 ventures. External validation not yet started.
Edge4No tool treats a pitch deck as a living instrument. The 5P constraint is the moat.
Trend5AI makes personal instruments viable. Static documents are dying.
Conversion2No external users yet. Freemium model unvalidated.
Composite4804 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 2

Quality Targets

#CriterionTargetNow
O1External users fill a grid10 users0
O2D7 return rate> 35%
O3Grid completion rate> 60% of cells filled
O4Shared grids3 grids shared externally0
O5Time to first fill< 20 minutes

Kill signal: 10 external users fill a grid. If zero return within 7 days, it's a novelty, not an instrument. Stop building and revisit the job. Kill date: 2026-06-30.

Platform

What do we control?

Current State

ComponentBuiltWiredWorkingNotes
CDD Prototype (5 patterns)YesYesYesLive
Figma TemplateYesVisual design + grid layout
Stackmates AuthYesYesYesUser accounts, sessions
Convex data layerYesYesPartialReal-time sync available
Mental model content (1,200+ pages)YesTemplates for grid cells

System Design

INTERACTION LAYER: Mission Control | Stack | Morning | Compass | AI
DECK ENGINE: 5x5 Matrix | Modes | Scales | Snapshots
DATA LAYER: Convex (Cells | Priorities | Versions | User State)
PLATFORM: Stackmates (Auth | Storage | Sharing | AI Prompts)

Build Ratio

~60% composition (prototype, auth, data layer), ~40% new code (persistence, modes, sharing).

Protocols

How do we coordinate?

Build Order

SprintFeaturesWhatEffortAcceptance
0#1, #5Grid component + Convex persistence2 weeks25 cells render, edit persists across sessions
1#2, #3, #4, #6Card View + Mode Toggle + Scale + Highlights2 weeks375px swipe, toggle preserves data, gaps glow
2#7, #8, #9Snapshots + Templates + Share2 weeksSave snapshot, pre-fill from template, public link works
3#10AI CoachingTBDV3 — after external validation

Commissioning

#FeatureInstallTestOperationalOptimize
15x5 GridPrototype
2Card View
3Mode Toggle
4Scale Selector
5Save + Persistence
6Empty Cell Highlight
7Snapshots
8Templates
9Share
10AI Coaching

Players

Who creates harmony?

Job 1: Founder Alignment

Situation: Starting a new venture or entering a new quarter with too many priorities.

ElementDetail
Struggling momentStrategy session produces 30 items. Can't see which five matter.
Current workaroundNotion board, Google Doc, whiteboard photo that fades
What progress looks like25 cells filled. Gaps visible. Weekly review takes 10 minutes.
Hidden objection"I don't want to commit to five — what if I'm wrong?"
Switch triggerThird strategy session in a row that produces no lasting artifact

Features that serve this job: #1, #3, #5, #7

Job 2: Living Pitch

Situation: Preparing to pitch an idea to investors, partners, or a team.

ElementDetail
Struggling momentPitch deck freezes at version 1. Reality moves. Slides don't.
Current workaroundRemake slides before every meeting. Copy-paste from old decks.
What progress looks likeOne living deck that compounds — each review sharpens the pitch
Hidden objection"Investors expect slides, not a grid"
Switch triggerPitched with stale data. Lost credibility.

Features that serve this job: #1, #3, #8, #9

Job 3: Personal Navigation

Situation: Life transition — career change, health goal, relationship rebuild.

ElementDetail
Struggling momentToo many dimensions changing at once. No single view.
Current workaroundJournal, therapy, self-help books — all separate, none connected
What progress looks likeFive life priorities visible. Gaps named. Weekly check-in ritual.
Hidden objection"Self-reflection tools feel cringe"
Switch triggerSomething breaks — burnout, breakup, wake-up call

Features that serve this job: #2, #4, #7

ICP: The Misaligned Operator

Founders, team leads, and operators who run strategy sessions that produce clarity — then watch it evaporate. They don't need another canvas. They need a constraint that makes compression deliberate.

Psycho-logic: "I know I should prioritise. I just can't see it all on one page." The hidden fear isn't picking wrong — it's that seeing the gaps will reveal how much they don't know. The grid makes that safe by normalising gaps as strategy, not failure.

Relationship to Other PRDs

PRDRelationshipData Flow
Time + MindPeerPrompt Deck aligns WHAT matters → Time+Mind closes gap between WHAT and DID
Agent PlatformPlatform (depends on)Auth, AI agent paths, data layer
Sales Dev AgentPeerFilled grid feeds ICP qualification

Context