L0product

Better Practice

A purpose and project planning app that sells the path — roadmap (where this is heading), ventures (what's being built), time investment (plans + progress), method (Tight Five), and predictions (why this has value). One URL replaces every conversation about 'what are you building and why.'

480

Priority Score

Pain × Demand × Edge × Trend × Conversion

Customer Journey

Why should I care?

Five cards that sell the path

1Why

Agents are becoming economic actors.

Who builds the tools the AI uses to do business?

Full depth: Stories that prove the roadmap sells

Picture

Name the Pain

1 / 5

Problem

Situation

Founder running multiple ventures has no single surface that tells the story: where this is heading (agentic commerce), what's being built (ventures + progress), why the path has value (predictions), and that there's a system (Tight Five method). Every explanation requires a fresh conversation that fails because the language doesn't match.

Intention

A purpose-driven app where the roadmap IS the argument. Protocol stack shows the market direction. Ventures show the positions. Plans show execution. Tight Five shows the method. One URL replaces every conversation.

Obstacle

Data exists across two repos and a planning DB but no user-facing surface synthesizes it into a narrative. The engineering app is admin tooling. The dream repo is a knowledge base. Neither sells the story.

Hardest Thing

Making pre-revenue ventures look like legitimate progress. The evidence is structural (method, plans, kill criteria, protocol positioning) not financial. The app must convert systematic intent into visible credibility.

Scorecard

Priority (5P)

4/5

Pain

3/5

Demand

4/5

Edge

5/5

Trend

2/5

Convert

Readiness (5R)

Principles4 / 5

Performance2 / 5

Platform3 / 5

Process2 / 5

Players3 / 5

What Exists

Component	State	Gap
Better Auth (email/password)	Working	Exists in drmg-sales. Needs wiring to new app.
Planning DB + CLI	Working	Plans, projects, tasks tracked. Need read-only surface.
Venture JSON data	Working	berleytrails.json has tightFive, killCriteria, financial. Need aggregation.
this-week.json	Working	Days, timeblocks, progress items. Need rendering.
family-dashboard.json	Working	Aggregated view created. Need app to consume it.
Marketing site generator	Working	Scaffolds Next.js app with auth. Need to run for betterpractice.
UI component library	Working	Progress, ProjectCard, StageCard, StatusBadge all exist.
Protocol stack content	Working	Agent protocols + Verifiable Intent pages written. Need simplified rendering.
Better Practice app	Missing	No app exists. Generator not yet run.
betterpractice.space domain	Missing	Domain not configured. Need Vercel project + DNS.

Relationships

PRD	Contributes
Prompt Deck	Fractal pair: Prompt Deck = instrument, Better Practice = instrument in use. The five questions ARE the product.
Time + Mind	Time+Mind allocates WHEN. Better Practice shows WHY. Both serve the same user — the solo founder wearing every hat.
Marketing Sites	Generator scaffolds the app. Better Practice is an instance of the marketing-site generator with siteType=app.
Admin Portal	Auth and org management. Better Practice uses the same Better Auth stack.
Project Management System	Plans data source. Better Practice reads plan completion from the planning DB.

Kill Signal

10 people get accounts. If zero return after 7 days, the roadmap doesn't sell. Stop building.

Questions

Can a new viewer explain what's being built and why after 2 minutes on the app?

Does the protocol stack thesis land for someone who doesn't know what A2A or UCP means?
When all ventures show $0 actual revenue, does the structural evidence (plans, kill criteria, method) compensate — or does it look like expensive busy-work?
If Trev signs in and the argument still happens, was the product wrong or the audience wrong?