Community Protocol Service
Touch For Fun
Embodied social rituals that measurably increase trust and belonging in an AI-first world
3.8/10
Tight Five
1Purpose
Why does this matter?
Digital connection can't replace physical trust.
2Principles
What truths guide you?
Consent first. Measure trust, not vibes.
3Platform
What do you control?
Protocol quality, facilitator standards.
4Perspective
What do you see others don't?
Touch is infrastructure, not entertainment.
5Performance
How do you know it's working?
Trust delta, repeat attendance rate.
5/10
5/10
3/10
2/10
5P Feedback
Pain4 / 5
Demand2 / 5
Edge3 / 5
Trend4 / 5
Conversion1 / 5
Critical Metrics
Critical Path20% / 80%
Need 2 live pilots with trust measurement data
Critical Mass5% / 60%
Need facilitator community + recurring sessions
Critical Velocity0% / 100%
$0 revenue, $0 burn (pre-pilot)
Priorities
- Does the protocol create a measurable trust delta?
- Will facilitators adopt and pay for the infrastructure?
- Is delivery efficient enough to be profitable at 60% margin?
- Does the consent process make touch safe enough to repeat?
- What should be documented so the protocol compounds?
Platform Dependencies
| ID | Feature | Why |
|---|---|---|
| AUTH-001 | User registration | Facilitator and participant accounts |
| USER-001 | User profiles | Facilitator identity and credentials |
| USER-002 | Organisation management | Group and club management |
| COLB-001 | Team chat | Community coordination |
| AI-002 | Conversational AI | Onboarding and protocol guidance |
Context
- Flow — Touch protocols induce flow: deterministic ritual structure + probabilistic human response
- Players — Connection is the product: facilitators and participants in coordinated trust
- Third Space — Where collective flow happens: the delivery environment
- Ventures — All ventures on the platform
- Feature Matrix — Platform feature commissioning status
Questions
What would change if Touch For Fun measured facilitator vitality alongside participant trust?
- Which number in the unit economics breaks the model if it's wrong by 2x?
- If the touch elements were removed entirely, would the rituals still create measurable trust improvement?
- At what point does Stage 1 protocol work generate enough data to validate Stage 2 certification?