AI Decision Framework
What criteria should be considered to allow an ordinary person to give an informed decision on how to proceed with AI?
Perspectives
Consider the views of leading AI researchers, computer scientists, and ethicists.
- Look at the credentials and track records of those making arguments on both sides.
- Pay attention to consensus statements from reputable scientific organizations.
Risks vs Rewards
Evaluate the potential positive and negative impacts of AI development, including:
- Economic effects (job displacement vs. productivity gains)
- Social impacts
- Safety and security concerns
- Potential for misuse
- Long-term existential risks
Timelines and Urgency
- Assess different projections for when transformative AI capabilities may be achieved.
- Consider whether proposed actions are time-sensitive or if there is flexibility to wait and gather more information.
Feasibility
Feasibility of proposed actions
- Examine how realistic and implementable suggested policies or interventions are, both technically and politically.
- Consider potential unintended consequences.
Evidence
Evidence and reasoning quality
- Evaluate the strength of evidence presented, distinguishing between speculation, reasoned arguments, and empirical data.
- Look for logical consistency and consider counterarguments.
Ethical Frameworks
- Consider different ethical perspectives on AI development, such as utilitarianism, human rights-based approaches, or virtue ethics.
- Reflect on your own values and how they align with different positions.
Predictions
Global and long-term perspectives:
- Think beyond short-term national interests to consider global impacts and effects on future generations.
- Consider existential risks and opportunities for humanity as a whole.
Accountability
Transparency and accountability:
- Assess proposals for their provisions on AI governance, oversight, and public engagement.
- Consider how different approaches might affect democratic control and corporate responsibility.
Control Systems
Adaptability and course correction: Look for approaches that allow for ongoing assessment and adjustment as AI capabilities evolve and new information becomes available.
History
Historical analogies: Consider how the development of other transformative technologies (e.g. nuclear power, biotechnology) has been managed, and what lessons might apply to AI.