Skip to main content

Outcome Map

Template: Outcome Map | Tight Five: Purpose

What does success look like for a mental model that teaches mental models?


Desired Outcome

Each page added makes every other page more valuable. Links are edges. The architecture creates value no single page could hold alone.


Contributing Factors

FactorEvidence
Six nav sections cross-linkedPlay → Science → Standards → Systems → Scoreboard → Agency — wired
17 meta articles publishedDream is being sold, monthly cadence established
400+ docs pagesEngineering depth exists across all nav sections
Five flow engineering templatesMethod is documented and self-referencing
AI co-creation with Claude CodeContent velocity 10x a solo human, quality gates automated
Question-first architectureEvery page opens with a question — the reader enters thinking

Obstacles

ObstacleMitigation
No analytics — can't read the gaugeAdd basic tracking (pages/session, link depth, return rate)
Dense entry for newcomersLanding page with clear entry point per ICP
Bridge between /meta/ and /docs/ is implicitInline link-thinking throughout articles, not just "Go Deeper"
No revenue from the model itselfVentures monetize. The model attracts.

Investigations

QuestionOwnerStatus
Which entry point leads to deepest traversal?AnalyticsNot started
Do meta article readers follow links into /docs/?AnalyticsNot started
What's the shortest path from stranger to practitioner?Test with 3 peopleNot started
Can someone use the templates without guidance?Test with 1 personNot started

Success Measures

Binary. Did we or didn't we.


Roles

RoleWhoAccountable For
Judgment, voice, final gateHumanAll decisions
Drafting, linking, validationAI (Claude)Execution speed and consistency
Architecture evolutionBothQuality of questions

Next Actions

  • Set up analytics (pages/session, link depth)
  • Test nav chain traversal with one person
  • Fill evidence loop in The Picture

Gate: All sections filled. Proceed to Value Stream →