Skip to main content

The Picture

What does success look like for a thinking system that teaches thinking?

A loop without a gauge is motion. This page is the gauge — the outcome map filled in, the picture we measure against.

Three Signals

LevelSignalProxyProves
SelfDecisions improveChoices that reference the modelThe system works for its builder
TransferBetter questions out than inLink depth from entry pointThe architecture creates value
CompoundConnections create emergent valueCross-referral from /meta/ into /docs/Links are edges, not decoration

Level 1 before Level 2. Level 2 before Level 3.

Outcome Map

Dreamineering
Desired OutcomeEach page added makes every other page more valuable
Contributing FactorsSix cross-linked nav sections. Meta articles that sell the dream. 400+ docs pages with engineering depth. Templates that transfer the method.
ObstaclesNo measurement system. Dense entry for newcomers. Bridge between dream (/meta/) and engineering (/docs/) is implicit.
InvestigationsWhich entry pulls deepest? Do meta readers follow links into docs? What is the shortest path from stranger to practitioner?
Success MeasuresSee below
Next ActionsAnalytics. One hypothesis. Evidence loop.

Success Measures

Binary. Did we or didn't we.

The Setpoint

The VVFL runs on every page. Without a setpoint, the gauge reads nothing.

Setpoint: each cycle produces a better question than the last.

Not more content. Not more pages. Sharper questions. Denser connections. Architecture creating value no single page could hold.

If aligned — apply more force. If not — step away and rethink.

Evidence Loop

CycleHypothesisOutcomeBetter Question
1Cross-linking nav sections creates traversal

Fill this table. The empty cells are the gauge reading.

Context

  • Outcome Map — The blank version of what this page fills in
  • The VVFL — The loop this picture measures
  • Scoreboard — Where system outputs get measured
  • Science — Hypothesis, experiment, compare, iterate
  • Evolution — What compounds when the loop runs long enough