Copywriting
Elite article output is a system, not inspiration.
Human Role: Editorial direction, voice calibration, final judgment AI Role: Research, drafting, optimization, distribution prep Spectrum: AI-Assisted
| Phase | Brief & Research | Structure & Outline | Drafting | Optimization | Editing & Gate | Publish & Distribute |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Define brief, audience, SEO | Outline, validate structure | First draft, quality check | SEO, readability, conversion | Content + copy edit, final gate | CMS, LinkedIn, distribution |
Quality and consistency come from locking the brief and gates before drafting, then running this sequence.
| Without this workflow | With this workflow |
|---|---|
| Ad-hoc drafts, late alignment | Brief and persona locked before drafting |
| Generic hooks, weak CTAs | Hook and CTA defined in brief; validated at gate |
| Voice drift, rework | Voice and quality gates in checklist; no publish until all boxes checked |
Overview
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Transform ideas into articles that attract, educate, and convert |
| Trigger | Content calendar slot, campaign need, or opportunity identified |
| Frequency | Weekly (minimum), or as content strategy demands |
| Duration | 2-4 hours (with AI assistance) |
| Owner | Content Lead / Marketing |
| Output | Published article + LinkedIn adaptation |
Checklist
An elite content writing style guide is not only a tone document; it is an operating system for consistent judgment, cleaner drafts, and better editorial outcomes. Based on Dreamineering’s writing and article-copywriting docs, the strongest checklist starts with clarity of thought, then locks in structure, voice, quality gates, and publishing standards. mm.dreamineering
Core foundations
Start by defining what the guide is for, who it serves, and what “good” looks like in practice. Dreamineering’s writing capability frames strong writing as clear thinking, while the article workflow requires alignment to persona, strategic goal, search intent, and desired action before drafting begins. See control system and mm.dreamineering.
- Purpose of content: attract, educate, convert, inform, persuade, or support. mm.dreamineering
- Target audience definition: persona, pain points, questions, terminology, awareness level. mm.dreamineering
- Strategic role of each piece: awareness, consideration, or conversion. mm.dreamineering
- Core message test: What are you trying to say, have you said it, can you say it more simply. mm.dreamineering
- Desired lingering thought: the single idea the reader should remember after reading. mm.dreamineering
Voice system
The guide should separate permanent voice from situational tone so writers can stay recognizable without sounding robotic. Dreamineering’s article protocol already gives a useful baseline—“visionary yet grounded, professional but conversational”—which can be expanded into explicit rules and examples. mm.dreamineering
- Brand voice attributes: 3 to 5 traits with definitions, such as visionary, grounded, precise, generous. mm.dreamineering
- Tone controls by context: homepage, article, LinkedIn, sales page, customer update, sensitive issue response. mm.dreamineering
- “Be / not this” pairs: confident not arrogant, clear not simplistic, ambitious not hype-driven.
- Jargon policy: allowed terms, banned buzzwords, and rules for explaining technical language on first mention. mm.dreamineering
- Phrase bank: preferred words, signature phrases, avoided clichés, and off-brand wording. mm.dreamineering
Structure rules
Elite guides reduce friction by making content easier to scan, edit, and repurpose. Dreamineering’s docs emphasize strong headlines, subheadlines, atomic sentence structure, active voice, short paragraphs, and clear section flow from hook to CTA. mm.dreamineering
- Headline standard: value-centric, specific, compelling, and accurately summarizing the content. mm.dreamineering
- Opening standard: hook the reader fast and establish relevance in the first 100 words. mm.dreamineering
- Article architecture: hook, context, core sections, conclusion, CTA. mm.dreamineering
- Sentence rule: each sentence should have a clear subject, verb, and object. mm.dreamineering
- Paragraph rule: keep paragraphs to 1 to 3 sentences when possible. mm.dreamineering
- Read-aloud test: if it does not sound like something a real person would say, rewrite it. mm.dreamineering
- Subheading cadence: include scannable, benefit-oriented subheads every 200 to 300 words. mm.dreamineering
Quality controls
This is where a style guide becomes elite rather than decorative. Dreamineering’s workflow includes explicit editing and quality-gate standards such as factual accuracy, logical argument flow, voice consistency, readability targets, and a “do not publish unless all boxes are checked” gate. mm.dreamineering
- Thesis clarity: one clear argument or promise per piece. mm.dreamineering
- Evidence standard: claims must be substantiated with examples, sources, data, or reasoning. mm.dreamineering
- Originality check: add a distinct angle, more than a remix of competitor content. mm.dreamineering
- Readability target: appropriate grade level, with Dreamineering’s article workflow suggesting grade 6 to 8 for many marketing pieces. mm.dreamineering
- Sentence length control: avoid sentences over 25 words unless there is a clear reason. mm.dreamineering
- Consistency rules: punctuation, capitalization, spelling variant, Oxford comma, numerals, link style. mm.dreamineering
- Final gate: strong headline, strong hook, fulfilled promise, clear CTA, brand voice match, fact-checked claims, no ethical concerns. mm.dreamineering
Matrix
| Section | Checklist items |
|---|---|
| Identity | Purpose, audience, mission fit, strategic goal, desired reader action mm.dreamineering |
| Message | Core thesis, one lingering idea, unique angle, reader problem being solved mm.dreamineering |
| Voice | Voice traits, tone by context, “be/not” pairs, approved and banned language mm.dreamineering |
| Structure | Headline formula, hook standard, outline model, paragraph length, subhead frequency mm.dreamineering |
| Language | Plain English rules, jargon policy, active voice, sentence clarity, transition quality mm.dreamineering |
| Credibility | Fact-checking process, sourcing rules, evidence expectations, claim sensitivity rules mm.dreamineering |
| Conversion | CTA rules, value proposition clarity, internal links, strategic placement of asks mm.dreamineering |
| SEO | Keyword usage, title placement, meta description, slug, alt text, internal/external links mm.dreamineering |
| Editing | Content edit, copy edit, readability pass, duplication check, final approval gate mm.dreamineering |
| Channel adaptation | Rules for article, LinkedIn, website, email, docs, and repurposed formats mm.dreamineering |
| Examples | Before/after rewrites, on-brand vs off-brand samples, annotated model pieces |
| Governance | Owner, update cadence, version history, exceptions policy, training process mm.dreamineering |
Prerequisites
Tools Required
| Tool | Purpose | Access |
|---|---|---|
| Claude / AI Assistant | Research, drafting, optimization | API or chat |
| Grammarly or similar | Proofreading, readability | Subscription |
| Google Docs / Notion | Collaboration, version control | Team access |
| SEO Tool (Ahrefs, Semrush) | Keyword research, competitive analysis | Subscription |
| CMS (Docusaurus, WordPress) | Publishing | Admin access |
| Analytics (GA4, Plausible) | Performance tracking | View access |
Access Requirements
- CMS publishing permissions
- Brand guidelines document
- Tone of voice reference
- SEO keyword list (current priorities)
- Analytics dashboard access
Knowledge Requirements
- Understanding of target audience personas
- Familiarity with brand voice
- Basic SEO principles
- Content strategy alignment
Inputs
What you need before starting:
| Input | Source | Required? |
|---|---|---|
| Topic / Idea | Content calendar, opportunity, brief | ✓ |
| Target keyword(s) | SEO research, strategy doc | ✓ |
| Target persona (ICP) | ICP documentation | ✓ |
| Strategic goal | Campaign brief | ✓ |
| Reference materials | Research, interviews, data | Optional |
| Competing content | SERP analysis | Optional |
Process
Brief & Research
Duration: 30-45 minutes Responsibility: Human-led, AI-assisted
Step 1.1: Define the Brief
Complete this brief before any writing begins:
## Article Brief
**Working Title:**
**Target Keyword:**
**Secondary Keywords:**
**Target Persona:**
**Search Intent:** [Informational / Commercial / Transactional]
**Strategic Goal:** [Awareness / Consideration / Conversion]
**Desired Action:** What should the reader do after?
**Word Count Target:**
**Deadline:**
Step 1.2: Audience Research
- Review target persona documentation
- Identify 3-5 pain points this article addresses
- List questions the audience is asking (Quora, Reddit, social)
- Note the language/terminology they use
Step 1.3: Competitive Analysis
- Review top 5 SERP results for target keyword
- Note gaps in existing content (what's missing?)
- Identify unique angle or perspective we can offer
- Document content formats that perform (listicles, how-tos, guides)
Step 1.4: SEO Foundation
- Confirm primary keyword (search volume, difficulty)
- Identify 3-5 secondary/LSI keywords
- Plan internal linking opportunities (2-4 links)
- Identify external authority sources to reference
Phase 1 Output: Completed brief document with research notes
Structure & Outline
Duration: 20-30 minutes Responsibility: Human-led, AI-assisted
Step 2.1: Create Outline
Use this structure as a starting point:
## [Working Title]
### Hook
- Opening that creates curiosity or tension
- Why this matters NOW
### Context
- Brief background
- Why reader should care
### Core Content
#### Section 1: [Subhead]
- Key point
- Evidence/example
- Takeaway
#### Section 2: [Subhead]
...
#### Section 3: [Subhead]
...
### Conclusion
- Summary of key points
- Clear CTA
- PS: Engagement question (optional)
Step 2.2: Validate Structure
- Does the outline answer the search intent?
- Is there a clear logical flow?
- Are there 2-4 substantive sections?
- Is the CTA aligned with strategic goal?
- Does it offer something competitors don't?
Phase 2 Output: Approved outline ready for drafting
Phase 3: Drafting
Duration: 45-60 minutes Responsibility: AI-led, Human-reviewed
Step 3.1: First Draft
Use this prompt framework for AI drafting:
Write a blog post based on this outline:
[INSERT OUTLINE]
Requirements:
- Target audience: [PERSONA]
- Tone: Visionary yet grounded, professional but conversational
- Avoid: Generic phrases ("unveil," "realm," "dive into"), jargon without explanation
- Include: Specific examples, actionable frameworks, real-world applications
- Word count: [TARGET]
- Keywords to include naturally: [LIST]
Step 3.2: Draft Quality Check
- Hook creates immediate interest
- First 100 words establish relevance
- Each section delivers on its subhead promise
- Examples are specific, not generic
- Active voice predominates
- Paragraphs are 1-3 sentences max
- Subheadings are scannable and benefit-oriented
Phase 3 Output: Complete first draft
Phase 4: Optimization
Duration: 30-45 minutes Responsibility: Split (AI optimizes, Human judges)
Step 4.1: SEO Optimization
- Primary keyword in title, H1, first 100 words
- Secondary keywords distributed naturally
- Meta description written (150-160 chars, includes keyword)
- URL slug is clean and keyword-rich
- Internal links added (2-4 relevant pages)
- External links to authority sources (1-3)
- Images have descriptive alt text
Step 4.2: Readability Optimization
- Hemingway Grade Level: 6-8 (or appropriate for audience)
- No sentences over 25 words
- Bullet points/lists break up dense content
- White space is adequate
- Subheadings every 200-300 words
Step 4.3: Conversion Optimization
- CTA is clear and specific
- CTA appears at logical points (not only at the end)
- Value proposition is evident
- Social proof included if relevant
- Next step is obvious
Phase 4 Output: Optimized draft ready for editing
Editing & gate
Duration: 20-30 minutes Responsibility: Human-led
Step 5.1: Content Edit
- Thesis is clear and supported
- Arguments flow logically
- Claims are substantiated
- No fluff or filler content
- Voice matches brand guidelines
- Unique perspective is evident
Step 5.2: Copy Edit
- Grammar and spelling checked
- Punctuation is correct
- Consistent style (Oxford comma, etc.)
- No repeated words/phrases
- Transitions are smooth
Step 5.3: Final Quality Gate
Do not publish unless ALL boxes are checked:
- Headline is compelling (would you click it?)
- Opening hooks within 5 seconds
- Content delivers on headline promise
- CTA is irresistible
- Brand voice is consistent
- Fact-checked all claims
- No ethical concerns
- Aligned with Dreamineering mission
Phase 5 Output: Final approved article
Publish & Distribute
Duration: 15-20 minutes Responsibility: AI-led (execution), Human (approval)
Step 6.1: CMS Setup
- Title and meta description entered
- URL slug confirmed
- Categories/tags assigned
- Featured image set with alt text
- Author attribution correct
- Scheduled or published
Step 6.2: LinkedIn Adaptation
Transform the article into LinkedIn format:
Requirements:
- Length: 500-850 characters (or up to 3000 for longer posts)
- Line breaks for scannability
- Retain: Hook, core insight, CTA
- Add: 1-2 relevant emojis (if appropriate)
- Include: 2-4 targeted hashtags
- Tone: Professional yet approachable
- LinkedIn post drafted
- Hook is scroll-stopping
- CTA drives engagement
- First comment prepared (resource link)
Step 6.3: Distribution Checklist
- Published to CMS
- LinkedIn post scheduled/published
- Email newsletter inclusion (if applicable)
- Internal team notified
- Relevant communities identified for sharing
Phase 6 Output: Live article + distribution in progress
Outputs
| Output | Format | Destination |
|---|---|---|
| Published article | MDX/HTML | mm.dreamineering.com |
| LinkedIn post | Text | |
| Performance tracking | Analytics | GA4/Plausible |
Success Criteria
Quality Metrics
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Readability score | Grade 6-8 | Hemingway app |
| SEO score | 80+ | Yoast/RankMath |
| Brand voice alignment | Approved | Human review |
| Factual accuracy | 100% | Human verification |
Post-publish metrics
| Metric | Target | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|
| Page views | 100+ | First 7 days |
| Time on page | 3+ minutes | First 30 days |
| Bounce rate | <70% | First 30 days |
| LinkedIn engagement | 2%+ | First 48 hours |
| Conversions (if applicable) | Defined per article | First 30 days |
Role & Skills
Roles
| Role | Responsibilities |
|---|---|
| Content Lead | Brief approval, final quality gate, voice calibration |
| Writer (Human/AI) | Research, drafting, optimization |
| Editor | Copy editing, fact-checking |
| SEO Specialist | Keyword research, technical optimization |
Skills Required
| Skill | Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Writing | Intermediate+ | Clear, engaging prose |
| SEO | Basic | Keyword usage, meta tags |
| Brand voice | Intermediate | Dreamineering tone |
| AI prompting | Basic | Effective delegation to AI |
| Judgment | High | Quality decisions |
Full XV Alignment
This activity maps to the marketing backs:
| Position | How This Activity Serves It |
|---|---|
| #9 Prompts | Article brief triggers AI content generation |
| #11 Products | The article is a marketing asset we ship |
| #12 Persuasion | Copy moves readers toward action |
| #13 Protocols | This workflow is the standard |
Failure modes
| Failure | Symptom | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Generic content | Reads like every other article | Add unique perspective, specific examples |
| Keyword stuffing | Awkward, unnatural language | Write for humans first, optimize second |
| Weak hook | High bounce rate | Test 3-5 alternatives, choose strongest |
| No clear CTA | Low conversions | Define desired action before writing |
| Voice drift | Doesn't sound like brand | Review against tone guidelines, human edit |
| Fact errors | Corrections needed post-publish | Verify all claims before final approval |
Downstream Processes
What happens after this workflow:
| Process | Trigger | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Content Repurposing | Article published | Atomize into social, email, video |
| Performance Review | 7 days post-publish | Analyze metrics, document learnings |
| Content Update | Quarterly or traffic drop | Refresh with new data, examples |
| VVFL Feedback | Performance data available | Update this workflow based on what works |
Templates & Resources
Quick-Start Brief Template
Use the Article Brief in Brief & Research (Step 1.1). Add Unique Angle to the brief when you have a differentiated take.
AI Drafting Prompt
You are writing for Dreamineering, a platform at the intersection of AI, blockchain, crypto, and DePIN infrastructure.
Write a blog post on: [TOPIC]
Target audience: [PERSONA]
Tone: Visionary yet grounded, professional but conversational
Avoid: Generic AI phrases, jargon without explanation, passive voice
Include: Specific examples, actionable insights, clear structure
Structure:
- Hook (surprising insight or provocative question)
- Context (why this matters now)
- Core content (2-4 sections with subheadings)
- Conclusion with clear CTA
Keywords to include naturally: [LIST]
Word count: [TARGET]
LinkedIn Adaptation Prompt
Transform this article into a LinkedIn post:
[ARTICLE SUMMARY OR KEY POINTS]
Requirements:
- 500-850 characters for quick read (or up to 3000 for detailed)
- Line breaks every 1-2 sentences
- Hook in first line
- Core insight in middle
- CTA at end
- 2-4 relevant hashtags
- Professional but approachable tone
Questions
Which quality-gate checkbox do you skip most often, and what would make you stop skipping it?
- If you had to cut one phase from this workflow for a "minimum viable article," which would you drop and what would you risk?
- Which row in the before/after table (without vs with this workflow) would your last three articles fall into?
- What would your Final Quality Gate reveal if you scored a published piece against it today?
Context
- Marketing Activities Index — The Work Chart
- Marketing Principles — What guides decisions
- Tight Five — Core questions and positioning this workflow supports
- LinkedIn Posting — Social distribution
- Content Strategy — Blog strategy
Changelog
| Date | Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 2024-12 | Initial workflow created | Standardize article production |