Skip to main content

Financialization

Why does everything cost more while your paycheck stays the same?

Money stopped funding production and became a game unto itself. Different rails don't fix this — traditional finance and DeFi run the same extraction pattern.

The Mechanism

Capital used to flow to production. Then it stopped.

EraCapital Flowed ToResult
IndustrialFactories, infrastructure, productionBroad prosperity
FinancializedFinancial engineering, asset inflationWealth concentration

What shifted:

YearEventEffect
1982Stock buybacks legalizedCompanies inflate stock instead of investing in workers or R&D
1980s-2000sFinancial deregulationBanks gamble with deposits, create exotic instruments
2008+Central bank interventionMoney printing inflates assets, rewards holders over earners
OngoingInformation asymmetryInsiders front-run every opportunity, retail arrives last

The score got confused with the game. Money was supposed to measure value created. Now money creates money — proximity to the printer is the game.

The Numbers

Metric1970s2020s
Finance share of GDP~4%~8%
Finance share of corporate profits~15%~30%
CEO-to-worker pay ratio20:1350:1
Home price to income ratio2.5x5-10x
Real wage growth (adjusted)PositiveFlat

Corrosion

EffectWhat It Breaks
Talent misallocationSmart people go to finance instead of building things
Short-termismQuarterly earnings over long-term value
Standards decayCompetition becomes who cuts corners fastest
Trust erosionIf the game is rigged, why play fair?
Political captureMoney buys rules that make more money

The metacrisis — tech risk, environmental collapse, coordination failure — all get worse when capital flows to extraction instead of production.

Same Game

DeFi recreated the same extraction on blockchain rails. One coin spun fast enough to look like ten.

Extraction PatternTradFiDeFi
Front-runningDark pools, HFTMEV extraction — $1.8B+ cumulative on Ethereum
Sandwich taxSpread captureSandwich attacks — $289M in 2025, one trader lost 98% on a single swap
Gatekeeper rentBank feesProtocol fees — $6.1B in H1 2025 (+113% YoY)
Insider advantageIPO allocationsPre-mine — insider ownership 15% (ETH) to 58% (FLOW) at launch
Leverage gamesDerivatives, CDOsRecursive lending, yield farming
Vanity metricsGDP, stock priceTVL — double-counts assets at ~2x real value

The tool isn't broken. The incentive structure is. Open rails don't fix extraction when the agents on those rails optimize for the same game.

Abundance Problem

The Diamandis crowd frames abundance as exponential graphs and trillion-dollar markets. Still denominated in the financialization frame.

FrameMeasuresCreates
Abundance as numberGDP, market cap, TVLMore extraction at scale
Abundance as capacityTransformation capability, flow qualityReal production expanding

Abundance is a mindset, not a metric. Real capital deployed to real work — improving how value is transformed and distributed — expands capacity. Spinning financial instruments faster concentrates numbers.

Herman Daly drew the line: growth (quantitative increase) is not development (qualitative improvement). Kate Raworth's Doughnut Economics frames the same insight — thrive within boundaries, don't worship the growth line.

The Diagnostic

QuestionFinancializedProductive
Where does capital flow?To assets, then back to more assetsTo production, then to distribution
What does the agent optimize?Return on capital velocityReturn on value transformation
What standard does it raise?Extraction efficiencyQuality of output
Who benefits from growth?Holders closest to the sourceBuilders and users
What compounds?Financial complexityProductive capability

Context