Benchmark Standards
How do you know progress is real instead of narrative?
Benchmarks convert standards from opinion into operational evidence.
Why Benchmarks
| Without Benchmarks | With Benchmarks |
|---|---|
| Claims compete | Evidence compares |
| Work drifts | Variance is visible |
| Decisions are political | Decisions are thresholded |
| Quality depends on heroics | Quality depends on protocol |
Benchmark Families
Use domain-specific benchmark standards for each layer:
| Family | Focus | Primary Use |
|---|---|---|
| AI/LLM | Model and workflow performance | Reliability, cost, latency, safety |
| Blockchain | Settlement and interoperability performance | Transaction quality and network utility |
| Wallet Safety | Wallet UX and architectural safety | Key protection, transaction transparency, destructive operation prevention |
| Information Architecture | Navigation and findability quality | Information retrieval speed and clarity |
| UI Design | Render, usability, and accessibility quality | Human-visible quality gates |
Trigger Loop
Benchmarks only matter if they trigger operating decisions:
| State | Trigger | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Pass | Meets all required thresholds | Promote current standard |
| Warn | Misses a non-critical threshold | Run corrective loop and re-test |
| Fail | Misses a critical threshold | Hold rollout or rollback |
No trigger, no benchmark discipline.
Use Sequence
- Select the benchmark family for the system you are evaluating
- Define thresholds before execution
- Run evaluation with reproducible protocol
- Trigger decision workflow from result state
- Record outcome and update standard
Context
- Standards — Standards define repeatable outcomes
- Process Optimisation — PDCA operating loop
- Performance — Measurement and decision discipline
- Network Protocols — Coordination layer across systems