Skip to main content

Aligned Priorities

How do you get a room of stakeholders to agree on what matters most?

The Tight Five Prompt Deck — 5 priorities x 5 dimensions alignment matrix
The Tight Five Prompt Deck

Give them cards. Make them sort. The argument about order IS the alignment.

The Exercise

Five cards on the table. Each card is a priority with a claim, a picture, and a table — a Prompt Deck slide. The facilitator doesn't present slides. The stakeholders sort them.

StepWhat HappensWhat It Reveals
DealPlace 5 cards face-up on the tableThe priorities exist
SortEach person ranks cards left-to-right by importanceIndividual mental models visible
CompareShow all rankings side by sideWhere alignment exists and where it doesn't
ArgueDiscuss the disagreements — not the agreementsThe hidden assumptions surface
CommitLock the order. Column 1 = build first.Consensus has coordinates

The sorting forces a decision that a slide deck never does. You can nod along to a presentation. You can't hide behind a card sort.

Why Cards

PresentationCard Sort
Passive — audience listensActive — participants choose
Order is the presenter'sOrder is the room's
Disagreement is invisibleDisagreement has coordinates
"Any questions?""Why did you put that first?"
Consensus assumedConsensus earned

This is presenting inverted. Instead of one idea per slide delivered to an audience, it's one idea per card sorted by the audience. The consulting psychology shifts from "I'll show you what's broken" to "you show me what matters."

The Grid

Once cards are sorted left-to-right (priorities), fill the grid top-to-bottom (dimensions):

RowLensWhat It Forces
NumbersWhat must be true financially?Revenue, margin, runway per priority
ActivitiesWhat work actually matters?The vital few vs the trivial many
TechWhat technology creates leverage?Build, buy, or agent
ForcesWhat external pressure shapes this?Regulation, competition, timing
DataWhat do you need to know?The question that unlocks the decision

Five priorities across. Five dimensions down. Twenty-five cells. One sentence per cell max — if it takes more, you don't understand it yet.

Read down columns — does each priority have numbers, activities, tech, forces, and data aligned? If not, it's a wish.

Read across rows — are your numbers consistent? Do your activities match your tech investments?

Find the empty cells — that's where the risk lives. Every blank is an unasked question.

Alignment Signals

SignalWhat It Means
Columns alignPriority has a coherent plan
Rows contradictPriorities compete for the same resources
Cells are emptyYou haven't done the thinking yet
Sort order unanimousReal consensus — rare and valuable
Sort order splitThe real conversation starts here

From Exercise to Product

The card sort is the manual version of the Prompt Deck product. The product digitises the exercise:

Manual (cards)Digital (product)
Cards on a tablePromptDeck slides on screen
Sort by handDrag to reorder
Grid on whiteboardPersistent 5x5 grid
Photograph the resultSnapshots track evolution
Repeat next quarterWeekly return loop compounds

Context

Questions

When stakeholders sort the same five cards into different orders, is the disagreement the problem — or the most valuable output?

  • What happens when you run the exercise quarterly and the sort order hasn't changed — is that alignment or stagnation?
  • If one sentence per cell is the rule, what thinking are you skipping when you need a paragraph?
  • The empty cell is an unasked question. How many of your current priorities have empty cells you've never noticed?
  • At what point does the facilitator's framing of the cards predetermine the sort — and how do you prevent it?