Problem Solving
What is the most important problem you need to solve with greatest urgency? How do you know?
| Step | Question | Go Deeper |
|---|---|---|
| Classify | What type of problem? | Classification |
| Define | What's the real problem? | Constraints |
| Align | Do we agree it's THE problem? | Consensus Gap |
| State | Can we articulate it clearly? | Problem Statement |
| Value | Is it worth solving? | Problem Valuation |
What if every problem was defined so clearly that anyone could start solving it immediately?
Classification
What type of problem are you solving? See Systems Thinking for frameworks.
| Type | Description | Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Simple | Cause and effect well-defined | Best practice exists |
| Complicated | Requires domain expertise | Best practice analysis |
| Complex | No obvious pattern, experts don't exist | Experimentation proves what works |
| Chaotic | Can't understand cause/effect relation | Probe for black swan exposure |
| NP-Hard | Can't solve in polynomial time | Verify solutions quickly |
Constraints
Before solving, follow the stream to the extremes to make a map of reality.
- What are the actual constraints vs assumed constraints?
- What's the root cause vs the symptoms?
- Who benefits from the current state?
Consensus Gap
"I see a problem" → "We agree on THE problem"
This is where coordination dies.
| Failure | Sound |
|---|---|
| Different perception | "That's not a problem for me" |
| Different priorities | "This other thing is more urgent" |
| Different definitions | "When you say X, I hear Y" |
| Different incentives | "Solving this helps you, not me" |
To build consensus: share raw data, find root causes together, commit only when aligned.
Problem Statement
A problem well stated is half solved. Follow the streams to get a true map of reality.
- What is the problem that needs to be solved?
- Where is the problem observed? (location, product)
- What is the origin of the problem?
- Who is impacted? (customers, businesses, departments)
- When does the problem occur? (triggers)
- Why the problem matters, and why it prevents progress
- How is the problem observed? (symptoms)
- How often is the problem observed? (error rate, magnitude, trend)
- Quantify loss of money, time, quality, environmental, motivation
- Importance to individuals and organisations to quantify urgency
If I had an hour to solve a problem I'd spend 55 minutes thinking about the problem and five minutes thinking about solutions — Albert Einstein
Systems Thinking
| Approach | When to Use |
|---|---|
| First Principles | When conventional wisdom isn't working |
| Inversion | When stuck - ask "how would I make this worse?" |
| Design Thinking | When the problem involves human needs |
| Matrix Thinking | When connecting patterns across domains |
Problem Valuation
A problem is the gap between where you are and where you want to be. The size of the gap is the size of the opportunity. Problems are raw material. The right questions are the catalyst that converts them into opportunities.
- Progress: What does progress look like?
- Performance: How can quality and quantify progress?
- Perspective: Who needs this? Who understands this?
- Platform: What infrastructure and know-how required?
- Product: How can the solution sell itself?
Can you sell that the reward is worth the effort?
1. What annoyed you? (trigger)
↓
2. What was the actual problem? (root cause)
↓
3. How should it work? (vision)
↓
4. What would success look like? (artifacts)
↓
5. Will you bet on fixing it? (appetite)
Example
A great problem statement quantifies the gap:
Weak: "Our onboarding is confusing"
Strong: "40% of new users abandon signup before completing step 3 (email verification), costing ~$12K/month in lost conversions. Users who complete onboarding have 8x higher 30-day retention."
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What | 40% abandonment at step 3 |
| Where | Email verification step |
| Who | New users |
| How much | $12K/month, 8x retention difference |
| Why it matters | Direct revenue impact + retention signal |
The gap is clear: 40% → 15%. The bet is obvious.